Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - June 16, 2012, Winnipeg, Manitoba
C M Y K PAGE A17
F OR the second time in as many weeks, major
news stories have featured relatively small
budgetary cuts made by the Harper government.
First we were told a famous freshwater research
facility in northwestern Ontario would be closed
as part of a $ 79- million saving in the Fisheries Department.
Scientists have deplored the government
decision and have praised the facility as being
unique. Closer to home is the
news of cuts to Parks Canada
and the resultant decrease in
services that will take place
at Riel House. The horror
story of this cut is that some
historical artifacts will have
to be stored in, of all places,
the province of Quebec.
That these cuts have received
such prominent attention
proves two things. First,
the government knowing it
would be subject to criticism, is determined to
proceed with its program of reducing spending.
Second, it proves government spending is not such
a bad thing after all, and the promises made by
all political parties to cut spending can do more
harm than good. But the politicians who call for
reduced spending will protest they are referring
to " wasteful spending."
One has to have sat around a table, scrutinizing
billions of dollars in expenditures to know how
difficult it is to come across expenditures that are
easily identified as " wasteful."
Certainly the auditor general will identify savings
that could have been made if abuses of one
kind or another had not taken place. But these
abuses do not really affect the global expenditures
of the government or do so only marginally.
In order to materially affect government spending,
you really have to get down to the level of
actual government programming and, if you do,
stories such as Riel House are inevitable.
As long as the prevailing philosophy is government
spending is bad and the cause of our economic
woes there will be no escaping continued
efforts by governments wedded to these propositions
from doing what they have done and will
continue to do. The sad result is some worthwhile
activities will be discontinued with no economic
benefit. Indeed, the economy will suffer.
In order to stop stories like these, we would have
to dramatically revise our philosophy of government.
We would have to say the greatest loss to
our economy occurs not by government spending
but rather the lack of employment of able- bodied
citizens who are capable of producing useful
goods and services but have not found jobs to take
advantage of their potential.
Second, we must stop downgrading people employed
in the public sector and acting as if the only
wealth- producing work is in the private sector. We
must adopt the maxim anyone who is performing
a useful service contributes to the commonweal
and this is true for people paid by the public as
well as by those privately employed.
Making employment available to everybody,
even at government expense, can only enhance
the economy provided the work is useful. Nobody
argues the fisheries and parks programs that are
being cut are not useful. They are being discontinued
ostensibly because it will save money. It
will not save money. If those who are put out of
work do not find new jobs it will cost money.
We have already proved that when we employ
people to do useful things at government expense,
we improve the economy. Between 1939 and 1945,
we trained, housed, clothed, fed, and transported
to Europe hundreds of thousands of Canadians
who were put to work, and who didn't produce
things consumers could buy. On the contrary,
much of their labours were directed at destroying
things. Did these efforts result in economic
distress? To the contrary, they ended the Great
Depression.
The late Rubin Bellan, an economist who lectured
at the University of Manitoba, wrote a
splendid essay entitled Let's declare war on Great
Britain. The theme was that given the fact war
improved the economy, the solution to our problems
was to have a war. But, said Bellan, since war
would also help the economies of our enemies, it
would make sense to go to war against our friends.
Nobody need get hurt. Ninety per cent of our missiles
missed their target in the last world war and
it would not be hard to up that to 100 per cent.
We would need a political party with the courage
to make drastic changes. Along with government
spending, one would have to be willing to
have concomitant taxation. You would need a man
like Tommy Douglas. The present political scene
does not look promising.
Sidney Green is a Winnipeg lawyer
and former NDP cabinet minister.
Last of its kind
Your June 13 story City team finds new Ebola
cure is both excellent news and sad news. It
is excellent for obvious reasons in that it shows
what amazing things Winnipeg's National
Microbiology Laboratory can accomplish when
given half a chance and adequate funding.
A treatment for one of the world's deadliest
viruses, which can also be used to treat other
diseases, is not something that comes along
every day, and even Federal Health Minister
Leona Aglukkaq acknowledges that. The fact
that it was developed in Winnipeg is most certainly
a feather in our collective caps.
The sad part of this story is that, given
Stephen Harper's ill- conceived and illogical
budget cutting, this type of discovery will
likely never occur again. As we have seen, his
government is not as much concerned with
such scientific breakthroughs or environmental
protection issues as it is with his concept of
what the world should look like and Canada's
place in it.
LAURIE ETKIN
Winnipeg
Slap on the wrist
Re: Ruff start, but happy ending ( June 13).
It's pretty sad to realize that even if the person
who tossed the unwanted puppy in the Dumpster
is caught, he or she will likely only get a
slap on the wrist for that dastardly act.
Animal abusers continue to thrive in this
province, and our elected officials don't care
enough to do anything about it.
ANDY CHIASSON
Winnipeg
��
People are too quick to judge that someone
put the puppy in the Dumpster. I can think of
two other explanations for what happened.
First, depending on the surrounding of the
Dumpster, the puppy could have fallen in from
climbing on things nearby.
Or perhaps due to its small size, it could have
crawled into one of the garbage containers and
accidently got tossed in the Dumpster without
anyone knowing.
We must not jump the gun and let our emotion
get in the way of determining how something
came to be.
TREVOR CIELEN
Winnipeg
Too big to regulate
In his June 7 letter, Gas price mystery, Ken
McLean asks if anybody polices the oil companies
in Canada when they are gouging the
consumers. Modern corporations and multinationals
have become so huge and powerful
that they are above all government regulations.
There is no way to police them or control
their activities.
Corporations are only concerned with making
profits, not in public interest or human
rights. They are like untouchable, invisible
monsters. What can be done to control a super
corporation like Shell, for example, that has
financial assets equivalent to the combined
national budgets of Venezuela, Colombia, Peru
and Ecuador?
Former U. S. president George W. Bush once
commented on Exxon's responsibility for
polluting the coastal waters: " Nobody can tell
those guys what to do."
Economist Adam Smith, the so- called father
of capitalism, warned about this two centuries
ago. He supported a fair free market, but one
under government supervision.
FRANCISCO VALENZUELA
Winnipeg
��
With the June 13 crude oil price of $ US83.22
per barrel and the U. S. dollar at $ 1.03, the
price of regular unleaded gasoline in Winnipeg
should be 96 cents per litre at normal profit
margins.
At a price of $ 1.21 per litre, you are paying
25 cents per litre in pure excess profit. Across
Canada, an extra margin of 25 cents per litre
generates an additional profit of $ 25.42 a day.
These calculations are based on Hugh Mackenzie's
Gas Price Gouge: The Sequel .
I want to know why neither the provincial or
federal government departments of consumer
affairs are not investigating the oil companies
for price gouging and price fixing.
KEN WARDELL
St. Adolphe
Protecting ourselves
In his June 7 letter, Denying medication ,
Richard Goldman complains about reduced
health- care benefits for refugees and cites as
an example an illegal immigrant.
Refugees do not fall from the sky or appear
out of the sidewalk in Canada. We have to protect
ourselves and our economy from illegal
immigrants and medical tourists who come to
Canada for free health- care services. The Supreme
Court recently upheld a decision by the
Federal Appeal Court that illegal immigrants
are not entitled to health- care coverage under
our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. ( see Nell
Toussaint v. Attorney General of Canada).
JOHN FELDSTED
Winnipeg
Jets won't miss it
Re: Manitoba politicians seek reprieve from
federal government for Riel House ( June 13) .
It is my opinion that perhaps a very small portion
of the millions of dollars that the province
and the city are giving to the Winnipeg Jets
in either cash or tax concessions be directed
instead to Riel House.
The Jets are a very, very successful business
entity. They do not require any government
handouts.
RONNIE OSADCHUK
Winnipeg
Let's make a deal
Re: Research facility price tag? $ 1. I have
emailed Joyce Bateman ( with a copy to Pat
Martin) offering $ 100 for the Experimental
Lakes Area facility. I am prepared to go to
$ 1,000.
I send this letter to the Free Press editor to
make my offer public, certain and clear. I am
not joking; I will make that purchase if I am
offered it.
I look forward to my purchase. Ms. Bateman,
please contact me. You have my address and
home and work phone numbers.
TIM SAYEAU
Winnipeg
��
At this time, when the federal government
intends to close down the research station
at the Experimental Lakes Area, we at Tall
Grass Bakery recognize how important it is to
acknowledge the role environmental education
provided by ELA scientists played in the
formation of our Winnipeg business.
Tall Grass, formed in 1990, currently employs
50 people and supports at least a dozen
local and organic farms. These farms provide
the bakery with grains, vegetables and fruits,
eggs, pasta, meats and cheese.
We were inspired by scientists at ELA who
taught us how to protect the environment by
linking healthy economic activity with the
protection of water and health of the soil. Our
founding partners included an ELA scientist
who brought an awareness of how important
clean water and soil is to the production of
healthy food, a former ELA head cook who was
raised on a Hutterite farm where production
and preparation of local food were strongly
linked, and other environmentally aware members
of the Grain of Wheat Church community.
TABITHA LANGEL
Winnipeg
��
For only $ 1, the NDP can purchase this
world- class facility and the $ 2- million yearly
operating costs are only half of the $ 4- million
subsidy the province has agreed to give
to the Winnipeg Jets every year from lottery
revenues.
Surely, this is at least half as important as
subsidizing millionaires for playing a game
they love.
BILL PARKES
Winnipeg
HAVE YOUR SAY:
The Free Press welcomes letters from readers. Include the author's name, address and telephone number. Letters may be edited.
Letters to the Editor, 1355 Mountain Avenue, Winnipeg, R2X 3B6. Fax 697- 7412. Email letters@ freepress. mb. ca
Letters represent the opinions of their writers and do not reflect the opinions of the Winnipeg Free Press or its staff.
�� LETTER OF THE DAY
When I saw your June 13 story Statue
sought to honour paddler's life, tenacity .
I nearly jumped out of my seat. I live just
half a block from Senior Citizen's Park on
Kildonan Drive at Bronx Place. I have lived
in this area all my life. I have long been an
admirer of Don Starkell.
I had the honour of meeting him twice at
our local grocery store, shaking his hand and
wishing him well.
I have to speak out and say that I can't
believe that anyone would honestly consider
any other place to honour Starkell with a
statue. People in East Kildonan all know of
him and are proud of his connection to Senior
Citizen's Park.
There is at present a large stone marking
his accomplishment there. A statue of him in
this park would be more honoured and honouring
than any other place in the world.
We need to place any statue of Starkell
in this park and rename it Don Starkell
Park. The park and the statue would belong
together.
JOS GATIEN
Winnipeg
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Winnipeg Free Press Saturday, June 16, 2012 A 17
POLL �� TODAY'S QUESTION
Do you think the gap between
rich and poor is
getting better or worse in
Winnipeg?
�� Vote online at winnipegfreepress. com
�� PREVIOUS QUESTION
Do you agree the Montreal
high school teacher should be
fired for showing the infamous
body- parts killing video?
YES 66% NO 34%
TOTAL RESPONSES 2,748
Winnipeg Free Press est 1872 / Winnipeg Tribune est 1890
VOL 140 NO 213
2012 Winnipeg Free Press, a division of FP Canadian Newspapers
Limited Partnership. Published seven days a week at 1355 Mountain
Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R2X 3B6, PH: 697- 7000
BOB COX / Publisher MARGO GOODHAND / Editor
JULIE CARL / Deputy Editor
WAYNE GLOWACKI / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS ARCHIVES
The late adventurer Don Starkell at home in 2010.
Made for each other
T HE working world was much cosier in 1980.
Only 1.7 billion people were cashing paycheques
a generation ago, nearly half on
farms.
Globalization has since upended labour markets,
though. In 2010, the world counted 2.9 billion
workers, with the emerging world responsible for
most of the increase: It added 900 million new nonfarm
workers, of which 400 million live in China
or India alone.
The meaning of these striking numbers is the
subject of a new study by the McKinsey Global Institute,
the consultancy's research arm.
The integration of China's and India's masses
into the world's labour market lifted legions out of
poverty. The transition from soil- scratching powered
rapid growth. China's non- farm workers are
seven times more productive than peasants. India's
performance lagged behind China's because it
struggled to move workers away from agriculture.
Non- farm employment merely kept pace with the
overall growth of India's labour force.
In rich countries, competition from millions
of new, low- skilled workers has acted as a drag
on wages for less- skilled ones in advanced economies.
At the same time, rich- world firms have invested
heavily in new technology, raising demand
for skilled workers faster than schools could increase
supply. In combination, these two trends
have raised inequality in developed countries and
strengthened the hand of capital relative to labour.
Workers' share of overall income fell seven percentage
points between 1980 and 2010.
These dynamics will continue, but also change,
reckon the authors of the study. Despite great efforts
to improve schools and universities, workers
in the emerging world are less educated than
those elsewhere. Some 35 per cent in China and a
stunning 70 per cent in India have no more than a
primary education.
This will change, however: China and India, Mc-
Kinsey predicts, will be the world's main source
for skilled workers during the next two decades.
The two countries alone will add 184 million college
graduates to the global labour market. As a
result, the centre of gravity of human capital and
innovation is likely to shift toward Asia.
Rapid productivity improvements will be necessary
to maintain income growth, particularly in
the parts of southern Europe that produce and procreate
the least. At current labour- force participation
rates, Italy, Greece, Portugal and Spain will
need productivity growth of 1.4 per cent a year,
more than twice what they managed between 1990
and 2010, simply to keep up recent growth rates in
output per head.
Taken together, these developments will lead to
big skills imbalances. McKinsey estimates that
during the next decade, rich countries and China
will need 40 million more college- educated workers
than they will be able to produce. At the same
time, employers across the world may find themselves
with 90 million more low- skilled workers
than they need. This glut will drag down wages,
worsening inequality.
Governments can mitigate the worst effects,
McKinsey argues. Innovation in higher education,
such as online teaching, would help raise the supply
of skilled workers. Labour- market reforms
would increase demand for less- skilled workers,
particularly in service industries such as health
care. Tax incentives would encourage households
to " outsource" household chores to paid workers.
Yet, in a global labour market that will be 3.5
billion strong in 2030, competition is bound to be
intense and often uncomfortable, for workers and
governments alike.
SIDNEY
GREEN
The value
of public
spending
Burgeoning workers of the world unite - or maybe not
The Economist
A_ 17_ Jun- 16- 12_ FP_ 01. indd A17 6/ 15/ 12 8: 29: 36 PM
;