Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - June 19, 2012, Winnipeg, Manitoba
C M Y K PAGE A7
I N 2010, citizens from the Philippines,
China and India made up more than 57 per
cent of provincial nominee immigrants to
Manitoba. By 2050, Citigroup projects that
China and India will be the two largest economies
in the world while the Philippines will
be the tenth largest. Canada, which was No.
10 in the world in 2010, will drop out of the
top 10 by 2030.
If economic growth in
the Philippines, China
and India results in
people staying in these
countries or immigrating
to these countries,
immigration to Canada
will either dry up or
undergo a massive shift.
It is not too late for
Canada to remain competitive
in attracting the
world's best and the brightest. In order to do
so, however, a shift is needed in government's
attitude towards immigration. Canada must
treat immigrants as customers, Canadian
diplomats must actively market Canada to
prospective immigrants, and immigration
officers must provide superior customer service
to make foreigners feel welcome.
Marketing Canada and providing superior
customer service to prospective immigrants
is necessary. In today's world, Canada not
only competes with countries such as Australia
and the U. S. for the world's best and
brightest, but with China and India as well.
China and India are not only convincing
more of their nationals to stay home but are
actively luring their expatriates back from
Canada and other countries to participate
in the economic growth China and India are
experiencing. If China and India are joined
by the Philippines in attracting people to
live and work in these countries, where will
Canada find the people it needs to continue to
grow?
In the last two months, Canada closed
immigration offices in the U. S., Germany,
Japan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Serbia and
Iran. Just last month, Citizenship and Immigration
Canada eliminated front counter service
at immigration offices in Canada. Will
closing offices result in superior customer
service? Will it result in better marketing of
Canada?
If closing immigration offices abroad and
eliminating front counter service in Canada
means that more immigration applications
will be processed faster, this may be
a positive development. One of the biggest
complaints about the immigration system
is that it takes months or years to get visas.
Faster customer service will go a long way
to improving the immigrant experience for
newcomers to Canada.
Faster processing alone, however, will not
make Canada more attractive. For years,
Canada has sat on its high horse and let the
world's best and brightest patiently wait in
line for years for the privilege of coming to
this country. With more career opportunities
popping up all over the world, if Canada is
truly to remain competitive in attracting
international skilled workers, it is necessary
to continue marketing Canada as a premier
place to work and live.
If closing offices abroad results in Canada
reducing its marketing to prospective immigrants,
there will be a long- term negative
effect on Canada's reputation as a destination
country. It is crucial that the diplomatic staff
who remain in these countries continue to
sell the benefits of moving to Canada.
Why do we need to treat immigrants as customers?
The answer is because they become
taxpayers. Since taxes are the only real revenue
stream for a government, taxpayers are
essentially a government's customers. Skilled
immigrants are Canada's future customers
and we should treat them as such.
Better customer service also means
improving the immigration application
experience. Currently, some immigration applications
require individuals to fill out up to
10 separate immigration forms, enclose over
two dozen documents, and then wait for years
for an answer. Email and phone inquiries to
Citizenship and Immigration Canada often
go unanswered for weeks at a time and the
online reference guide on the government's
website can come close to 50 printed pages. If
an applicant fails to provide all of the documents
requested and answer every single one
of the dozens of questions, the application can
be denied.
Last year, a case was taken to court by a
Philippine architect who was refused a visa
to Canada. The architect, who held a degree
in architecture, provided a reference letter
from his employer that did not contain a description
of the tasks or duties he performed.
As a result, his application was denied. In upholding
the refusal, the judge stated that the
refusal of the visa was proper because the
onus was on the architect to provide all documents
required in the immigration checklist.
While this decision is legally correct, it
does not assist Canada in attracting the best
and the brightest. Is letting a matter go to
court the best customer service Canada has
to offer? Whatever happened to phoning a
customer, asking the customer to come by the
office to answer questions, and helping him
or her understand how to fix the problem?
R. Reis Pagtakhan is an immigration lawyer
with Aikins Law in Winnipeg
Envy and greed
Lindor Reynolds and Mary Agnes Welch are
two of the finest writers the paper has on staff.
Both contribute vital work toward our community's
ongoing dialogue about social issues
in Manitoba.
This is why I was so disappointed with the
direction of their June 16 piece Divided we
stand , about the widening gap between the rich
and poor in Winnipeg.
Canada and Manitoba are blessed with one
of the very best economic mobility rates in
the world. With a marginal income tax rate of
roughly 45 per cent on our highest earners,
Canada also does more than a responsible job
of wealth redistribution, through comprehensive
social programs available to all.
The writers suggest that Manitoba somehow
fares better because of " our shortage of
super- rich people." The incredibly wealthy, not
to mention industries that may fall under their
responsibility, are an integral benefactor of
the social programs that Canadians hold dear.
Without them, programs like disability and
social assistance would not be feasible.
The politics of both envy and greed have
been the downfall of many great civilizations.
The ongoing politics of envy in this city since
1919 have done Manitobans little good. I ask
that the Free Press exercise extra vigilance
against it in the future.
DAVID SHORR
Winnipeg
��
Thank you for the article on the income
inequities in Winnipeg. Social stability, which
depends in part on equity in society, impacts
all of us. As a result, we really need to look
carefully at issues like this and ask ourselves
why we create the systems in our society that
result in these outcomes.
Certainly, individual decisions impact individual
outcomes, but when overall numbers
trend in certain directions, it is more likely the
result of something beyond individual choice.
One thing the article mentions in passing that
requires further exploration is the shrinking
of the middle class and the growing powerlessness
of workers at the same time as the declining
reach of unions.
I would also welcome a deeper look at what
has contributed to a growing median income in
inner- city communities over recent years. One
thing I do know is that there has been a shift
in the work of community organizations away
from charity toward initiatives that create
change ( give a man a fish vs. teach a man to
fish), healing and creating real economic opportunities
for people.
I suspect we will see some directions that we
can take as society to address the question in
this article.
BRENDAN REIMER
Winnipeg
Shared moment
Judge in sex flap breaks silence ( June 15).
I used to feel sorry for Lori Douglas as I
thought it was just a skeleton in her closet and
God knows we all have them. What I now find
is that the closet was bursting with lawyers,
judges and the Manitoba Law Society all sharing
in her moment of indiscretion.
The fact remains that naked photos of her
were on the Internet for all to see, so her integrity
as a judge has been compromised, and she
should have done the right thing and resigned
back in 2010.
Another fact is the law society knew about
this incident and did nothing, so it is as complicit
as she is. My only hope is the Canadian
Judicial Council inquiry into this sordid affair
finds her incompetent and censures the Manitoba
Law Society for its part in this matter.
KIM SIGURDSON
Winnipeg
Develop clear plan
Re: Solution for ' eyesores' elusive ( June 15).
The necessary redevelopment of Winnipeg's
surface parking lots won't happen by issuing a
vague directive and then moaning and groaning
when results don't magically appear.
It's not enough for Mayor Sam Katz to
simply say, " Here's a tax incentive, now make
it happen." I urge Katz to take the ideas that
we raised two years ago in the last mayoral
campaign for developing a clear plan that
shifts the focus away from surface parking lots
and encourages the development of multi- level
parkades and multi- use facilities.
That means getting business and downtown
stakeholders to the table to recommend a taxincentive
structure that works best for our city,
investing the $ 24 million from the questionable
sale of the Winnipeg Square parking garage in
projects that combine retail, housing and community
space with multi- tiered parking, and
drawing on best practices from cities around
the globe where cohesive, vibrant, liveable
streets are a reality.
As Coun. Jenny Gerbasi astutely noted, tax
incentives may not be enough, but we won't
know without priority given to an actual plan
that is debated on the floor of council and contains
actual timelines for implementation.
Whether we're talking about water parks,
rapid transit or surface parking lots, it is clear
that the public is best served when all the facts
are on the table, stakeholders are consulted and
meaningful planning takes place.
JUDY WASYLYCIA- LEIS
Winnipeg
Parents know best
Re: Picking up parents' slack ( Letters, June
9). The press may be free in this province, but
parenting is becoming more regulated and less
free if parents cannot opt their children out
of the school system's curriculum on human
sexuality.
The medical profession confirms that children
develop sexually at different rates. One
only needs to observe the differing ages that
menstruation or the need to shave begins with
students. That means their hormone levels
develop at different stages.
Why is the province insisting on stimulating
sex instructions for all students at the same
time? Parents are the best judges of when their
children are ready for each aspect of sexual
instruction.
The education system is supposed to prepare
our children for global competition in reading,
writing, mathematics and science, not in global
competition on sexuality. Unfortunately, they
seem to be doing a terrible job on the former
and an even worse job on the latter.
Perhaps if they concentrated their efforts
on the former and let parents take over sex- ed,
our children would better learn the basics they
need in life.
VALERIE WADEPHUL
Winnipeg
��
I am one of those parents who removed her
children from sex education classes, as it is my
firm belief that it should be taught in the home
with abstinence being the No. 1 priority.
There are many reasons why premarital
sex is not a good option. Does it get discussed
in class how a young girl loses her virginity
in a back seat of a car, let's say, and then gets
dumped the next day. Why? Because there was
no love, no commitment.
What about the emotional impact of having
sex before one is ready? Parents owe it to their
children to be open and up front concerning
sex and to teach abstinence first and foremost.
JUDY TYLER
Winnipeg
Making a difference
The Manitoba Marathon volunteers, spectators
and sponsors really make a difference.
I'm in my 50s and ran the Super Run on
Sunday. The volunteers, spectators and even
the announcer made it an experience I'll never
forget.
Their support and encouragement made me
feel like I was in the Olympics. Thank you so
much. You have motivated me to shoot for the
Free Press 10K next year.
JOANNE MARKS
Winnipeg
HAVE YOUR SAY:
The Free Press welcomes letters from readers. Include the author's name, address and telephone number. Letters may be edited.
Letters to the Editor, 1355 Mountain Avenue, Winnipeg, R2X 3B6. Fax 697- 7412. E- mail letters@ freepress. mb. ca
Letters represent the opinions of their writers and do not reflect the opinions of the Winnipeg Free Press or its staff.
�� LETTER OF THE DAY
Re: Rae bows out: will Trudeau jump in? ,
( Joan Bryden, June 14) and Whispers of
uniting the left growing louder ( Mia Rabson,
June 18). Unlike U. S. Gen. William Tecumseh
Sherman who famously declined the
1884 Republican presidential nomination
by declaring, " I will not accept if nominated
and will not serve if elected," interim
Liberal leader Bob Rae has made no such
incontrovertible pledge.
Stating that " the way in which I can serve
my party best is by not running for the
permanent leadership" does not, however,
rule out his accepting the party's leadership
if it were offered via acclamation.
Given the lack of gravitas in the current
list of potential candidates, this artfully
passive strategy may indeed be the best way
Rae can serve the Liberal Party.
MARK S. RASH
Winnipeg
Winnipeg Free Press Tuesday, June 19, 2012 A 7
POLL �� TODAY'S QUESTION
Has the financial unrest
in Europe affected your
investment plans?
�� Vote online at winnipegfreepress. com
�� PREVIOUS QUESTION
Did you take part in the
Manitoba Marathon?
. Ran the full marathon 6%
. Ran the half 9%
TOTAL RESPONSES 2,606
Winnipeg Free Press est 1872 / Winnipeg Tribune est 1890
VOL 140 NO 216
2012 Winnipeg Free Press, a division of FP Canadian Newspapers
Limited Partnership. Published seven days a week at 1355 Mountain
Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R2X 3B6, PH: 697- 7000
A member of the Manitoba Press Council
BOB COX / Publisher MARGO GOODHAND / Editor
JULIE CARL / Deputy Editor
T HE warm reception the media accorded
a comprehensive report calling for more
openness and transparency by the Ontario
College of Teachers when it comes to disciplining
errant teachers is hardly surprising.
After all, media outlets, including The Waterloo
Region Record , have long grumbled about
the veil of secrecy that so often surrounds
cases where teachers accused by the college
of teachers of sexual improprieties or other
disciplinary matters are virtually shielded from
public identification. That will change - and it
deserves to - if the series of recommendations
( 49 in all) delivered by former Ontario Superior
Court chief justice Patrick LeSage are promptly
acted upon.
Among other things, LeSage has recommended
that the names of teachers found guilty of misconduct
be made public, that hearings into those
cases be open, and that teachers found guilty of
sexual assault involving students be decertified
for at least five years. They're all sensible proposals
that are worth endorsing.
But the Elementary Teachers Federation of
Ontario was also right, in responding to the release
of LeSage's report on June 7, to highlight an
equally concerning, issue: false abuse accusations
made against teachers.
In contrast to the publicity blackout that can
attend matters of misconduct, it's not unusual for
teachers accused of grievous offences, particularly
if criminal charges are laid, to find their
names in the newspaper or broadcast in local TV
or radio newscasts. Responsible media outlets
will follow those cases as they make their way
through the courts, and if an accused party is
found not guilty, provide an equal amount of publicity
to the acquittal.
But that is only a partial remedy to wrongly
accused teachers, who between the time of the
initial publicity and the public exoneration can
live in a very unsettled world. LeSage does make
recommendations on ways for the college of
teachers' investigations committee to improve its
screening of " frivolous or vexatious" complaints
to determine if they should proceed.
Teachers who are falsely accused - and
according to University of Ottawa education
professor Joel Westheimer, the number of such
incidents has grown dramatically in recent years
- can take no comfort in the fact that students
( often enabled by their parents) who level such
accusations face few, if any, consequences.
It's reasonable to ask if parents, in such instances,
should be held legally responsible in serious
cases. An amendment to the province's Parental
Responsibility Act, as at least one teachers' union
representative has suggested, could afford the
proper remedy.
Bad teachers must face the proper discipline, in
an open arena. Equally, students and parents who
act badly by levelling unfounded allegations need
to be held accountable.
Wrongly accused teachers also need protection
Rae could be acclaimed
Liberal interim leader Bob Rae: ' artfully passive strategy.'
Foreigners
are valued
customers
REIS
PAGTAKHAN
OTHER OPINION
The Waterloo Region Record
. Ran in a different race 11%
. Ran through the possibilities
for next year 19%
. Shook my head in disbelief
( that should burn a few calories,
right?) 55%
A_ 07_ Jun- 19- 12_ FP_ 01. indd A7 6/ 18/ 12 9: 06: 18 PM
;