Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - September 03, 2013, Winnipeg, Manitoba
C M Y K PAGE A13
Winnipeg Free Press Tuesday, September 3, 2013 A 13
POLL �� TODAY'S QUESTION
Do you think it's time to open
Portage and Main to foot
traffic?
�� Vote online at winnipegfreepress. com
�� PREVIOUS QUESTION
What's the best part about
going back to school?
Seeing friends again 38%
TOTAL RESPONSES 2,267
Winnipeg Free Press est 1872 / Winnipeg Tribune est 1890
VOL 141 NO 287
2013 Winnipeg Free Press, a division of FP Canadian Newspapers
Limited Partnership. Published seven days a week at 1355 Mountain
Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R2X 3B6, PH: 204- 697- 7000
BOB COX / Publisher PAUL SAMYN / Editor
JULIE CARL / Deputy Editor
" Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice,
shame on me." So the British Parliament decided
it didn't want to be shamed
by following another prime
minister into another unwinnable
war on the basis, yet
again, of shoddy intelligence
reports. It voted 282- 275
against committing British
forces to the planned American
attack on Syria.
After the vote on Aug.
29, Prime Minister David
Cameron admitted former
prime minister Tony Blair
had " poisoned the well" by leading Britain into
the Iraq war in 2003 on the basis of false intelligence
reports about Iraq's non- existent " weapons
of mass destruction." That was why neither the
public nor even some members of Cameron's
own party now trusted his assertions on Syrian
" WMD." " I get it," Cameron said, and promised
Britain would stay out of the coming war.
On the next day, U. S. President Barack Obama
followed the British government's example by announcing
he would seek the approval of Congress
before launching strikes on Syria. He still felt
the Syrian regime should be punished for using
poison gas, he said, but it turns out the operation
is not " time- sensitive" after all. Everything can
wait until the U. S. Congress resumes sitting on
Sept. 9.
This came as a great surprise to many people,
but it shouldn't have. Obama is probably secretly
grateful to Britain for pulling out, because it has
given him an excuse to postpone the attack -
maybe even to cancel it, in the end. He foolishly
painted himself into a corner with his tongue last
year by talking about a " red line" that he would
never allow the Assad regime in Syria to cross,
but he wasn't elected to be policeman of the
world.
That was the role George W. Bush tried to play,
but American voters want no more of the wars
that come with it. Obama got U. S. troops out of
Iraq, and they'll soon be out of Afghanistan as
well. He doesn't want to end up fighting a war
in Syria, and that will be hard to avoid that if
he starts bombing. " Once we take action, we
should be prepared for what comes next," wrote
Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, only one month ago. " Deeper
involvement is hard to avoid."
Retired general Anthony Zinni, former U. S.
commander in the Middle East, expanded on that
with brutal clarity. " The one thing we should
learn is you can't get a little bit pregnant. If you
do a one- and- done ( a few days' punitive airstrikes
with Tomahawk cruise missiles) and say you're
going to repeat it if unacceptable things happen,
you might find these people keep doing unacceptable
things. It will suck you in."
Obama's problem is he has fallen into the
clutches of Washington's foreign- policy establishment,
which has enduring purposes and prejudices
that usually overpower the particular views
and wishes of passing presidents and Congresses.
Consider its six- decade loathing of Cuba and its
35- year vendetta against Iran. ( It hates to be successfully
defied.)
This establishment has no problems with
weapons of mass destruction so long as they are
on its side. It has never renounced the right to
initiate the use of nuclear weapons, although they
are a 100 times deadlier than poison gas. It didn't
even mind the Shah of Iran working to get them,
back when he was Washington's designated enforcer
in the Middle East. But it has never forgiven
the Iranians for overthrowing the Shah.
Washington then switched to backing its new
ally, Saddam Hussein, who used poison gas extensively
in his war against Iran in 1980- 88. U. S.
Air Force intelligence officers helped Saddam
to plan his gas attacks on Iran's trenches, and
the Central Intelligence Agency tried to pin the
blame for Saddam's use of gas against the Kurds
on Iran instead. Now Saddam is gone and Iraq is
Iran's ally ( thanks to George W Bush's invasion
of Iraq in 2003). But Iran is still the main enemy,
and the game goes on.
Syria is Iran's ally, so Washington has always
seen the regime in Damascus as an enemy, too.
More than 1,000 Egyptians murdered in the
streets of Cairo by the army that overthrew the
elected government last month is no cause for
U. S. intervention, because Egypt is an ally. More
than 1,000 Syrians killed in the streets of Damascus
by poison gas require an American military
response, because Bashar al- Assad's regime is
the enemy.
Assad's regime must not be destroyed, because
then al- Qaida might inherit power in Syria. But
it must be whacked quite hard, so it dumps Assad
- and with him, perhaps, the alliance with Iran.
The gas is a pretext, not the real motive for the
promised strikes.
Obama doubts this will work, and rightly
fears even a " limited" American attack on
Syria could end up as a full- scale war. The
events in London have won him some time, and
" letting Congress decide" is his best chance to
escape from his dilemma. What could possibly
go wrong?
Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose
articles are published in 45 countries.
Also: Obama must lead the world,
an editorial by the Washington Post,
at wfp. to/ comment.
W ASHINGTON - While
her brother was arming
the cannon of August and
aiming
them at a Damascene
despot, Barack
Obama's sister- fromanother-
mister was all
rainbows, roses and
moonbeams. " Great
ideas come gently as
doves," she said, quoting
Camus, but the cooing was scarce
heard amid the guns below.
We had come to the Center for American
Progress, a well- funded left- wing
wellspring, to see and hear the ravenhaired
Maya Kassandra Soetoro- Ng, MA,
MA, PhD, the Jakarta- sired, Americanmothered,
Canadian- espoused younger
sibling of the first Nobel laureate since
Henry Kissinger to make more war than
peace.
Engaged in far- off Honolulu as an instructor of
peace education for the humanities at the University
of Hawaii, Soetoro- Ng was appearing here in
support of an organization named Odanadi that
invades brothels in India and spirits off young
slaves to safety, assailing yet another nexus of
misery in an age - like all human ages - of intractable
hatred, calumny, violence, vengeance,
exploitation and woe, with her big brother Barry
foundering in the whirlpool. She is nine years and
11 days younger than Obama.
" You have more soft power than your brother,"
a Vietnamese woman informed her during her
presentation, while the headline on the Washington
Times in a box outside on H Street hollered:
Obama's ' soft power' policy in a world of hurt.
" With grasshoppers by my feet may I walk," the
president's sister sighed in response, invoking a
Navajo prayer. " It is finished in beauty."
In Hawaii, Soetoro- Ng told us, she encourages
her students to dig to " a more multi- faceted version
of the truth." She called for " powerful acts
of storytelling," reported she yearns to teach warring,
factional tribes how to tend gardens of peace
and boasted of how she trains former youth- gang
leaders to sheathe their shivs and " engage in benevolent
leadership."
(" This course will be project- centered and
will have no final exam," noted her syllabus for
the 2012 school year, but students were required
to keep a Daily Journal of Reflection and to
write a reconciliation plan for a current global
conflict. Neither of Barack Obama's bestsellers
was on her list of required texts. " Prof. Soetoro
was really smart," one matriculant gushed on
ratemyprofessors. com. " Plus, this is definitely
the best- looking professor I've ever had in my
life.")
Her innate tendency toward peacefulness, she
said, had been sown and sewn into her own soul
through the agency of her extraordinary mother's
uncommonly colour- blind and progressive world
view. Through Stanley Ann Dunham, the white
mid- American seeker and social anthropologist
who married first an African and then an Indonesian
man, she said, " I was granted comity, I was
granted tolerance, I was granted artistry, I was
granted sweetness."
" When she was dying," the president's mother's
daughter said, " she asked for her ashes to be cast
to the sea. She said, how else can I see all the
beautiful places and the people I love so much?"
In glimpses like this of his origins, we see the
Barack Obama that Barack Obama most deeply
might wish to be - the commander- in- chief of
a " reset," not with Vladimir Putin or Bashar
Assad, who are incorrigible and ultimately irrelevant
to the universal hopes of men, but with
the human heart itself; to wield the power, in his
half- sister's words, " to take something soft and
make enormous changes to something jagged
and explosive."
Two years ago, Maya Kassandra Soetoro- Ng,
whose husband, Konrad, also an educator at the
U of Hawaii, is from Burlington, Ont., wrote a
children's book that was inspired by a Georgia
O'Keeffe painting and titled Ladder to the Moon.
In it, a little girl's deceased and semi- mythical
grandmother - the embodiment of Stanley Ann
Dunham - emerges in a dream and leads the child
to the moon, where they grant succour to victims
of the 2004 tsunami (" a 50- foot wave sweeping
from the ocean to the land") and the World Trade
Center (" two tall towers that trembled and swayed
on quaking soil").
Lifted thus from mundane tragedy, the children
drink moon dew from silver cups and are joined
by " people whose hand pointed upward from a
synagogue, a temple, a mosque, and a steepled
church... connecting with each other in hope's
massive stream."
" They're praying," the grandmother whispers,
" For one another, and for us. And to make the
fighting stop."
Gripped by the same desire, but with no weapon
other than to wage even more war, a fatherless,
motherless president prepared to pull the trigger.
A few blocks away, his closest living kin spoke of
King and Gandhi, and of building " a bridge between
the self of the learner and the many people
who are living in the world."
Allen Abel is a Brooklyn- born Canadian journalist
based in Washington, D. C.
W HAT is racism? Manitoba media outlets
have been full of coverage of the charge
that a 2012 email sent by deputy premier
Eric Robinson was racist.
The controversy took off
after the media reported
that Osborne House CEO
Barbara Judt had filed a
complaint with the Manitoba
Human Rights Commission
alleging racism. Provincial
Tory Leader Brian Pallister
and others have repeated
that charge. As a result, as
Free Press columnist Dan
Lett puts it, " Robinson has
been forced to fight the allegations he is a racist."
Racism is repugnant and harmful. That's why
what's most worrying about the ongoing furor is
the confusion about what racism is - and isn't.
In his 2002 book Racism: A Short History ,
historian George Fredrickson offers an excellent
starting point for clarifying what racism is: " Racism
exists when one ethnic group or historical
collectivity dominates, excludes, or seeks to
eliminate another on the basis of differences that
it believes are hereditary and unalterable."
Fredrickson's summary contains three
important insights. First, racism is a social or
collective phenomenon, not simply a matter of
individual behaviour. It involves a relationship
between groups of people, one oppressing and
the other oppressed. Of course, these groups are
made up of individuals. People in the dominant
group may actively practise racism, passively
allow it to go on or consciously try to challenge
it.
Second, a group of people who experience racism
are treated as being somehow inherently
different than members of the dominant group.
Skin colour, other physical features, religion and
cultural practices have all been singled out by
dominant groups to define what makes oppressed
groups inherently different.
Third, racism is entirely a creation of society.
There is nothing natural about it or the different
groups it creates.
As Fredrickson and many other researchers
have shown, racism hasn't always existed.
It spread and became a global phenomenon as
European powers conquered and colonized other
parts of the world.
Racism is quite different from how earlier
conquerors sometimes treated the vanquished,
and it's also different from how religious groups
persecuted each other. With racism, the oppressed
people are treated as inherently different
and tainted.
Two examples illustrate this. The ancient
Greeks saw people as either civilized or barbarians
but this status was not something one
inherited. Jews were undoubtedly oppressed
in medieval Christian Europe because of their
religion. Sometimes they were even murdered
by mobs. But if they gave up their religion, they
would no longer be oppressed. In Fredrickson's
words, " even the mobs did not regard Jews as
beyond redemption. to be baptized rather than
killed was a real option." The development of racism
turned the persecution of Jewish believers
into the oppression of people designated as Jews,
regardless of individuals' religious beliefs. In
anti- Jewish racism, what mattered was " blood"
ancestry, not religion.
Once we understand what racism is, we can see
that in Canada today white people do not experience
racism - on the contrary. White people as
a group are not oppressed on the basis of their
so- called race.
The evidence is clear. Equal rights in law don't
translate into social equality. Whether we look at
income, wealth, health, housing, unemployment,
treatment by the police and the courts, political
power or any other meaningful measure, it is
people of colour and indigenous people who collectively
are worse off.
Obviously many white people also have low
incomes, live in poor housing or are treated
badly on the job. This is a consequence of class
division, not racism. The fact white people are
less likely to experience such harmful conditions
than indigenous people and people of colour
shows who experiences racism in Canada and
who doesn't.
No one denies some individuals who aren't
white may have hostile attitudes to white people
( given racism and colonialism past and present,
is this any surprise?). The important point is
such prejudices don't carry a lot of punch in a
society in which white people as a group aren't
oppressed. Such attitudes aren't manifestations
of racism.
Once we take a step back and see Robinson's
email in this larger context, it's obvious the allegations
of racism against him are wrong and
misguided.
In a racially divided province such as Manitoba,
if there is anything positive about this situation,
it's that there's an opportunity to sort out
what racism is so more people can take effective
action against it.
David Camfield is an associate professor in the
labour studies program at the University of
Manitoba, where he teaches a course on racism
and work.
ALLAN
ABEL
DAVID
CAMFIELD
Commander Obama's younger sister embodies soft power
Racism yardstick: It's all about oppression
Congress Obama's last hope to escape dilemma
EUGENE TANNER / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES
Maya Soetoro- Ng ( left) and her daughter, Suhaila Ng, 6, as they look at Soetoro- Ng's new book, Ladder to the Moon, at their home in Honolulu.
Getting back to the books 12%
New school supplies 9%
Nothing good about it 41%
GWYNNE
DYER
A_ 13_ Sep- 03- 13_ FP_ 01. indd A13 9/ 2/ 13 8: 09: 02 PM
;