Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - February 8, 2014, Winnipeg, Manitoba
C M Y K PAGE A7
winnipegfreepress. com MANITOBA SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2014 A 7
Performance Realty
Glen J. Sytnyk
477- 0100
www. glenjsytnyk. com
Sale applies to in- stock merchandise ONLY. Some items and brands
may be excluded – see in store for details. Inventory may be augmented
for better selection. Shop early for best selection.
Retirement &
Store Closing
After more than 50 years in the jewellery business,
Mr. W. K. Chan is retiring
and one of our stores will be closed.
www. wkchan. com
Almost all Fine Jewellery
Selling at Down to only 39¢ On the Dollar of the
Ticketed Price
SALE
St. Vital Centre ( Winnipeg):
Monday to Friday 10: 00 am – 9: 00 pm
Saturday 9: 30 am – 6: 00 pm
Sunday 11: 00 am – 6: 00 pm
Polo Park ( Winnipeg):
Monday to Friday 10: 00 am – 9: 00 pm
Saturday 9: 30 am – 6: 00 pm
Sunday 11: 00 am – 6: 00 pm
Brandon Shoppers Mall: Monday to Saturday 9: 30 am – 9: 00 pm • Sunday 11: 00 am – 5: 00 pm
Sell
FINAL
Reductions
Final Days! y s !
SALE ENDS
Saturday, Feb. 15
GOLD MEDAL DEALS
CALL OUR SALES HOTLINE TODAY!
1- 800- 918- 2931
Waverley Automall at Bishop Grandin
www. murraychevrolet. ca
* Price includes freight and all fees. Price does not include PST or GST. Payment based on lowest rate possible
over 84 months. Payments do not include PST or GST. O. A. C. Payments displayed are weekly. Vehicle
pictures are not the exact vehicles for sale.
0 % FOR
84 MONTHS
ON SELECT
MODELS
2014 Chevrolet Cruze LS
2014 Chevrolet Trax
2014 Chevrolet Silverado
2014 Chevrolet Equinox
Air &
Automatic
Automatic
& Air
Freight Included.
No admin fees.
Freight Included.
No admin fees.
Freight Included.
No admin fees.
Freight Included.
No admin fees.
I n c l u d e d $ 79 / wk
plus taxes
$ 79 / wk
plus taxes
$ 69 / wk
plus taxes
A u t o
$ 59 / wk
plus taxes
L ANDOWNERS around Lake Manitoba accuse the province
of misleading the public with its recent report that
claims the Portage Diversion had minimal impact on
lake flooding in 2011.
The government report, released late last year, states the
Portage Diversion created an “ artificial increase” on Lake
Manitoba of a mere 3.6 inches. The increase, from water diverted
from the Assiniboine River, is only barely above the
lake’s “ natural level” if it had no flood control structure, ie.
the Fairford Dam.
The government said its findings are “ reviewed and validated”
by an independent engineering company.
“ It’s just disgusting,” said Philip Thordarson, reeve for
the RM of Lakeview, which borders the southwest corner
of Lake Manitoba. “ How could they say that when we saw
water on top of our bridges, and even take out a bridge?”
Twin Beaches cottage owner Andy Zubrycki said the report
threw salt in the wounds of people who suffered losses
in the flood. “ People are obviously very upset. They think it’s
a very underhanded way of stating the facts,” said Zubrycki,
a Winnipeg pharmacist.
The report doesn’t jibe with an email Zubrycki received
from Phillip Mutulu, who was the province’s flood forecaster
at the time but who has since moved to Alberta. Mutulu
said the Portage Diversion raised Lake Manitoba by 4.13
feet. Zubrycki shared the email with the Free Press .
“ The total volume carried by the Portage Diversion in 2011
was 4.7 million acre- feet, or 5,800 million cubic metres. This
is equivalent to 4.13 feet of storage on Lake Manitoba,” Mutulu
said in an email, in answer to questions from Zubrycki.
There are two reasons for the discrepancy in figures, according
to the province. One, the province’s report determined
the Fairford Dam released about two feet of water
from Lake Manitoba at the same time the Portage Diversion
was diverting water into it in 2011. That cuts the 4.13 feet
Mutulu calculated down to about two feet.
But the province also maintains the Fairford Dam, a flood
control structure built in 1961 to allow outflow from Lake
Manitoba, had a cumulative effect in the years prior to 2011
of reducing Lake Manitoba by two feet. Therefore, the water
from the Portage Diversion produced a negligible increase
beyond the lake’s “ natural level.” The report acknowledges
there is some conjecture involved in forming the latter estimate.
“ What the report... shows is the degree to which the operation
of the Portage Diversion had very minimal impact on
the lake,” Minister of Infrastructure and Transportation
Steve Ashton said at a news conference when the report was
released.
But people hurt in the flood don’t think that’s a fair way to
assess whether they were deliberately flooded to save other
parts of southern Manitoba. The report seems to say because
the province gave the lake some flood control with the
Fairford Dam, it’s justified in taking it away and returning
the lake to “ natural levels,” said Zubrycki.
“ The government is saying it was not flooding us. It was
only taking away the benefit we received from the Fairford
Dam over the past few decades,” said Zubrycki. “ Why can’t
they be more acknowledging that the main reason Lake
Manitoba rose from April to July is because they used the
Portage Diversion?”
The province is facing at least two flood- related lawsuits,
including a $ 260- million class- action suit by six Lake Manitoba
flood victims for the alleged deliberate flooding of
Lake Manitoba.
bill. redekop@ freepress. mb. ca
Landowners scoff at province’s
claim diversion had small impact
Cottagers, expert dismiss notion
Lake Manitoba rose only 3.6 inches
By Bill Redekop
A_ 07_ Feb- 08- 14_ FP_ 01. indd A7 2/ 7/ 14 10: 00: 18 PM
;