Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - December 13, 2020, Winnipeg, Manitoba
C M Y K PAGE A7
SUNDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2020 ? WINNIPEGFREEPRESS.COM A 7NEWS I WORLD
L ONDON - When Britons vot-ed for Brexit in 2016, they were promised a smooth transition
to a new economic relationship with
the European Union. Now the two
sides are hurtling toward a tumultu-
ous split that threatens billions worth
of trade and hundreds of thousands
of jobs.
An outcome almost no one wants
looks increasingly hard to avoid, with
U.K. and EU leaders setting today
as the deadline for a "firm decision"
about the future of the deadlocked
divorce talks, and just three weeks
until the split becomes final on Jan. 1.
"Divorces are never easy," Xavier
Bettel, prime minister of EU member
Luxembourg, said Thursday. "I did a
lot of weddings when I was a mayor.
But I also did divorces as a lawyer,
and it's always difficult."
The messy EU-U.K. divorce has
been years in the making.
WHAT WAS DECIDED IN 2016?
Britain's 2016 EU membership ref-
erendum was dominated by whether
the country should quit the bloc it had
joined in 1973. What would happen
after that got less attention.
"Brexit was a mandate to leave the
European Union. There was never a
blueprint for what did leaving look
like," said Jill Rutter, program director
at the Institute for Government think-
tank.
Leaders of the pro-Brexit campaign
- including Boris Johnson, who is now
Britain's prime minister - said strik-
ing a new relationship with the bloc
after a U.K. exit would be easy, though
they provided few details. When
pressed, some leading Brexit cam-
paigners suggested Britain could have
a relationship like Norway or Iceland,
which have strong economic access to
the EU, and in return agree to follow
many of bloc's rules and standards.
WHAT CHANGED?
Since the referendum, Brexit has come
to be defined in an increasingly nar-
row way, largely as a result of British
politics.
In 2017, then-Prime Minister The-
resa May, a Conservative, under pres-
sure from the strong euroskeptic wing
of her party, declared that the U.K.
would leave the EU's single market and
customs union, and would end the free
movement of people from the bloc to
Britain.
That set Britain on course for a more
distant relationship with its neighbours
than many had realized when they
voted. It was still not enough for the
hard-core Brexiteers in Parliament,
who went on to reject the divorce deal
May negotiated with the EU because
they felt it kept Britain too closely tied
to the bloc. Pro-EU politicians who
wanted to keep tight bonds were too
divided to achieve their goal.
May eventually resigned in defeat
after her Brexit deal was rejected
by Parliament three times. She was
replaced by Johnson, who took an even
tougher line, defining Brexit as the
restoration of British sovereignty and
"taking back control" from Brussels.
That left the two sides' room for ma-
noeuvre in striking a deal even more
limited.
WHAT ARE THE STICKING POINTS
TO A DEAL?
The U.K. left the EU on Jan. 31, but
remains within the bloc's tariff-free
single market and customs union until
the end of the year, a transition period
agreed so the two sides could negotiate
a new trading relationship.
After months of increasingly testy
talks, there is no agreement on three
topics: competition, the resolution of
future disputes, and fishing rights.
Fishing is a symbolically important,
though economically minor, issue. For
British Brexit supporters, controlling
the nation's waters is essential. Coun-
tries like France and Spain have pow-
erful fishing lobbies that don't want to
lose the access they have now.
Still, both sides suggest they can
reach a compromise on fish. The other
issues - what constitutes fair competi-
tion, and what happens it if is breached
- are trickier, because they encapsu-
late the dilemma of Brexit: The U.K.'s
desire for freedom is at odds with the
EU's need to protect its unity.
The EU fears Britain will slash so-
cial and environmental standards and
pump state money into U.K. industries,
becoming a low-regulation economic
rival on the bloc's doorstep, so it is
demanding strict "level playing field"
guarantees as a condition of access to
its vast single market.
The U.K. government sees Brexit as
about sovereignty and "taking back
control" of the country's laws and bor-
ders. It claims the EU is trying to bind
Britain to the bloc's rules indefinitely,
rather than treating it as an indepen-
dent nation.
The two sides have never really
understood one another and now find
themselves boxed into corners, making
compromise hard.
"The trouble for the prime minister
is that all his language on sovereignty
has been pretty absolutist," Rutter
said. "It's quite difficult to compromise
on sovereignty."
HOW LIKELY IS A DEAL NOW?
Johnson and European Commission
President Ursula von der Leyen held
talks over dinner on Wednesday and
emerged pessimistic, stressing the
large gaps between them. They gave
their negotiators a few more days
and said they would decide by today
whether to give up on the talks.
Mujtaba Rahman, managing director
for Europe at political consultancy
Eurasia Group, still believes a deal is
still more likely than not, because the
political and economic damage of no-
deal would be huge.
"I think if you look at all the key
players - von der Leyen, (German
Chancellor Angela) Merkel, (French
President Emmanuel) Macron, Johnson
- I think it's in all of their interest to
do a deal," he said. "The question is,
with the time available, can they figure
out a fudge and a fix to this very diffi-
cult question on the level playing field?
And that, I think, is not obvious."
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IF THERE IS
NO DEAL?
With or without a deal, Jan. 1 will
bring major change. Citizens of Britain
and the EU can no longer move freely
to work and settle in each others' ter-
ritories, while importers and exporters
face new checks on goods and customs
declarations.
A no-deal exit will mean vastly more
disruption, with tariffs and other trade
barriers that would hurt both sides -
but especially Britain, which is much
smaller and does almost half of its
trade with the 27-nation bloc.
Without a deal, there is no guarantee
that planes can fly between the U.K.
and the EU, or British drivers whoosh
through the Channel Tunnel to France.
A "reasonable worst-case scenario"
drawn up by the British government
set out potential food and medicine
shortages, clashes between British and
European fishermen at sea, and "a rise
in public disorder."
A spokesman for the British prime
minister, Jamie Davies, insisted that
the government had "made extensive
plans for the end of the transition
period."
"We have a resilient supply chain,"
he said. "That will continue to be the
case after the transition period ends,
whether with a free trade agreement
or otherwise."
- Raf Casert in Brussels contributed to this story.
- The Associated Press
MESSY
divorce
How Brexit became such
a mess for the U.K. and EU
JILL LAWLESS
AARON CHOWN / WPA POOL / GETTY IMAGES / TNS
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson (left) and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen held talks Wednesday.
OLIVIER MATTHYS / THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
European Union leaders met for a year-end summit at the European Council building in Brussels Thursday and Friday with Brexit discussed on the sidelines as the end of the United Kingdom's transition period to leave the EU looms.
A_07_Dec-13-20_FP_01.indd A7 2020-12-12 5:25 PM
;