Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - August 12, 2024, Winnipeg, Manitoba
MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 2024
A4
● WINNIPEGFREEPRESS.COM
NEWS I LOCAL / WORLD
PHOTOS BY JOHN WOODS / FREE PRESS
BORA! LET’S GO!
Performers at the Brazilian pavilion open up the second week of
Folklorama at the RBC Convention Centre Sunday.
Chinese mining firm subsidiary disputes
Ottawa’s review of Peruvian gold mine deal
A
SUBSIDIARY of a Chinese
state-owned mining firm says
Canada is wrongly consid-
ering a national security review in
its agreement to purchase a gold and
copper mine in Peru.
In May, Vancouver-based Pan
American Silver Corp. announced
an agreement worth almost US$300
million to sell its stake in Peru’s La
Arena gold mine to Jinteng (Singa-
pore) Mining, a subsidiary of China’s
Zijin Mining Group.
Pan American said then that the
agreement was “subject to custom-
ary conditions and receipt of regula-
tory approvals.”
Since then, however, Canada’s In-
dustry Minister François-Philippe
Champagne has found the agree-
ment “could be injurious to national
security” and told the company in
late June that he “may” order a for-
mal review under the act.
Certain types of foreign invest-
ments involving Canadian compan-
ies are reviewed on national secur-
ity grounds and Jinteng voluntarily
notified the Director of Investments
at Innovation, Science and Econom-
ic Development Canada shortly af-
ter the agreement was announced.
The federal government main-
tains a list of nearly three dozen
critical minerals “essential to Can-
ada’s economic or national secur-
ity,” and reviews of investments in-
volving foreign companies like Zijin
are a protective measure to main-
tain Canadian control of materials
essential to “the green and digital
economy.”
Zijin is partially owned by the Chi-
nese government and overseen by
members of the Chinese Communist
Party.
Canada’s Critical Minerals Strat-
egy outlines how allies in Europe
have “experienced the conse-
quences of dependence upon non-
like-minded countries for strategic
commodities.”
Jinteng claims in a judicial review
application filed in Federal Court
in late July that the minister “lacks
jurisdiction under the act” to order
a national security review of the La
Arena deal.
“The targets are Peruvian en-
tities. They do not have a place of
operations in Canada or otherwise
carry on operations in Canada, they
do not have individuals in Canada
who are employed or self-employed
in connection with their operations,
and they do not have asset in Can-
ada used in carrying on their oper-
ations,” the application says.
National security experts have
warned of the geopolitical conse-
quences of letting foreign actors
scoop up Canadian companies in the
sector and Jinteng’s actions to skirt
the national security review process
represent a test of Ottawa’s reach on
companies incorporated in Canada,
but that have no domestic operations
and exist only to hold foreign assets.
Despite the voluntary notifica-
tion sent to Ottawa about the deal,
Jinteng claimed it doesn’t involve
a “Canadian business” as defined
by the act because the target com-
panies and their assets are in Peru,
though they’re owned by Pan Amer-
ican subsidiaries incorporated in
B.C. and Ontario.
The company claims in its appli-
cation that the minister’s decision
is “based on an untenable and un-
reasonable interpretation of the act
and is therefore wrong in law.”
Aaron Shull, managing director
and general counsel at the Centre
for International Governance In-
novation in Ontario, said the case
presents a “fairly complicated story
that is actually quite simple.”
He said the deal boils down to
a Canadian parent company sell-
ing Peruvian assets to a Chinese
company and the structure of the
subsidiaries involved could be for
various reasons such as shielding
liability and tax purposes.
Shull said the Canadian govern-
ment has indicated its intention to
scrutinize and “get tougher on” for-
eign investments involving things
like strategic minerals involving
“hostile states.”
“Especially from state-owned en-
terprises or enterprises that are so
closely affiliated with the state,” he
said.
The deal, he said, is not only for
gold mining assets, but also for
a nearby gold-copper mine and a
power transmission facility.
“You could probably make a fairly
compelling case that this is part of a
strategic play on China’s part in Lat-
in America,” he said.
“The Canadian government, the
American government, a whole
bunch of others have been making a
lot of noise about being tougher on
this type of stuff. I think that’s what
you’re seeing here is the kind of im-
plementation of that sabre rattling
in this kind of contested geopolitical
environment.”
Jinteng’s Canadian lawyers did
not respond to a request for com-
ment.
Innovation, Science and Economic
Development Canada also declined
to speak about Jinteng’s Federal
Court application.
“The Government of Canada does
not comment on matters before the
court. Due to confidentiality provi-
sions of the Investment Canada Act,
the Government cannot comment on
specific transactions,” the agency
said in an emailed statement.
The federal government an-
nounced “significant changes” to
the act in March this year.
“While foreign investment is es-
sential to economic prosperity, the
Investment Canada Act is a key
lever that allows the government of
Canada to act quickly and decisive-
ly when foreign investment would
threaten national security,” the de-
partment said at the time.
“As the world changes and threats
evolve, Canada needs new tools to
continue protecting the economy
and keeping Canadians safe.”
Shull said the case documents
don’t indicate what specific national
security concerns the minister may
have, but said he’ll be watching the
case closely for the outcome.
He said if the company’s success-
ful in staving off a national security
review, it would put Canada in an
“odd spot” by potentially giving for-
eign companies a means of structur-
ing deals outside of the legislative
regime with “just a bunch of cre-
ative lawyering.”
The underlying issues beyond
the specifics of the case involve the
intersection of national security,
prosperity and economic security,
which “we tend not to think about …
in a strategically integrated fashion
in this country,” Shull said.
“It’s part of a much bigger puzzle,”
he said. “The primary concern that
I have is that hostile states and stra-
tegic adversaries are looking at this
stuff in an integrated way.”
Champagne said when announ-
cing the changes in March that Can-
ada is a “top destination for foreign
investment worldwide.”
“While our government is com-
mitted to working with businesses
to attract investments and to create
greater economic opportunity for
all Canadians, we will not hesitate
to take action on transactions that
could harm Canada’s national and
economic security,” he said.
— The Canadian Press
DARRYL GREER
Two people killed
in house explosion
BEL AIR, Md. — Two people were
killed and 12 families displaced after a
Maryland house exploded Sunday amid
reports of a possible gas leak, fire offi-
cials said.
Neighbours described feeling and
hearing the early morning blast that
damaged a number of surrounding
houses in Bel Air, a town about 50 kilo-
metres northeast of Baltimore.
Firefighters were called to the area
around 6:40 a.m. for a report of a gas
leak and an outdoor odour of gas, said
Oliver Alkire, a master deputy with
the State Fire Marshal’s Office. Alkire
said that as firefighters were approach-
ing, they began receiving calls that the
house had exploded. First responders
pronounced one person dead at the
scene, and a second body was later
found in the rubble.
Alkire said that a home next door to
the explosion was heavily damaged,
and a woman in that house was treat-
ed for injuries on the scene. Two utility
workers were in the area to work on a
reported electrical issue, but author-
ities didn’t immediately say if that was
related to the explosion.
The first victim found was later iden-
tified as a contractor for the utility
BGE, according to a statement released
by Harford County Fire and EMS.
The State Fire Marshal’s Office said
late Sunday that the second body was
found in the rubble of the home at the
center of the blast. The person is be-
lieved to be the home’s 73-year-old
owner, but positive identification was
pending, according to the fire officials’
statement.
Investigators were also working to
establish how many houses were dam-
aged and how far the blast radius was.
Harford County fire officials said that
at least 12 families have been displaced
due to damage to neighbouring houses.
Authorities said there was no ongoing
threat to the public.
“I’ve been on the job for nearly 18
years, and this is one of the largest ex-
plosions I’ve seen,” Alkire said.
A photo posted by county officials
showed several firefighters around the
rubble of the home with another dam-
aged home in the background. Charred
pieces of wood were heaped on the
property, and insulation and splintered
wood spilled out into the street. Small
pieces of debris hung from nearby
trees. Later in the morning, emergency
workers were seen using heavy equip-
ment to search through the rubble.
— The Associated Press
;