Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - January 2, 2025, Winnipeg, Manitoba
THINK
TANK
COMMENT EDITOR: RUSSELL WANGERSKY 204-697-7269
●
RUSSELL.WANGERSKY@WINNIPEGFREEPRESS.COM
A7 THURSDAY JANUARY 2, 2025
Ideas, Issues, Insights
Ephemera has more value than we think
A
CCORDING to the history of printing,
what you are now reading is “ephemera.”
Newspapers are intended to be read, but
not kept. After all, as the old industry saying puts
it, “today’s news is tomorrow’s fish-wrap” — and
day-old digital versions are even less useful.
Books, however, are different. They are written
(and printed) to be kept — and hopefully read,
more than once. Bound and shelved, they are con-
sidered more permanent, something intended to
bridge generations of readers, especially through
the libraries that preserve them.
As an academic (and book collector), this
understanding of ephemera was hard for me to
accept when I worked in production during the
early days of the Winnipeg Sun. Every typo was a
dagger through the heart, especially if it was on a
page I had made.
When my own writing occasionally appeared in
print, the trauma of such mistakes was that much
greater. It was a legacy of error left to amuse
future generations and I would stew about the
shame of it all, to the amusement of former Tri-
bune colleagues who had been in the newspaper
business much longer than me.
Unfortunately, I have not outgrown this feel-
ing. Responsible now for eight printed books, I
probably feel as much chagrin for the typos and
mistakes they inevitably contain as any pleasure
in the accomplishment. But I have also had to
confront the literary reality that more people will
read this single column than all of those books of
mine combined, forever.
I only have the privilege of writing in this space
twice a month, but over the past nine years, that
has amounted to more than 200 columns and
175,000 words. And, while there might be an odd
printed column stuck on a fridge or buried on a
bulletin board, all of those words have vanished
with the wind. Ephemera.
If the goal is to leave a legacy for future gener-
ations, bound up in books, then this seems a waste
of time and effort. But if the goal is to change how
people think, to change the way they understand
their world, writing becomes more of a perfor-
mance, instead.
I live with a family of performers, producers
not of books but of other kinds of ephemera.
Whether the words are spoken or sung or prayed,
or the music is conducted or played, each time,
the performance is unique. Long hours of practice
lead to a single performance, perhaps just to a
small crowd, who only catch a glimpse of all the
time, effort and passion that led to such a fleeting
creation. Ephemera.
Of course, in the material world there are
“performance indicators.” So, we count the house,
determining the size of the audience through
ticket sales. A national bestselling book generally
requires 5,000 copies to be sold in a week. We
tally the downloads of a song, regarding physical
copies of albums as quaint musical relics.
But none of those numbers can ever measure
what that performance actually means. Many
years later, I can still remember Yehudi Menuhin
playing part of Beethoven’s Violin Concerto as an
encore with the Winnipeg Symphony Orchestra.
Money was tight and the tickets were expensive,
so my parents had rolled Christmas and birthday
together and given me a single ticket.
Another example of ephemera? Absolutely —
but my mother told me I would never forget it and
she was right.
There have been other times, without number,
where the performance I witnessed changed my
world in ways almost too insignificant to notice at
the moment. But small changes, over a lifetime,
can amount to major shifts in the trajectories of
who we are and what we do. Small acts, whether
of kindness or of misery, can transform people.
So, I hold doors open when I don’t need to and
smile at random strangers or let vehicles merge
in front of me when I have the right of way — just
because. That very small gift may change their
day in ways that bring a blessing to others I can’t
foresee and will never know.
Life, after all, is ephemeral. It is a performance
— not a rehearsal. As long as we live, we have the
opportunity to offer something of who we are,
both to the universe and to other people, every
day and in whatever circumstance.
Those other people may not appreciate or
understand our gift. They may sit through the
concert playing games on their phones or posting
“I wuz there” to their social media.
But I remain in awe, as I watch and listen to the
gift of your art, catching a glimpse of something
beyond the merely human, in that special moment
seized from time.
So, I write ephemera. While I still grieve the
books inside me I will never have the opportunity
to complete, I trust that these few words written
here might divert a thought and then perhaps
a life, into some other, better pathway toward a
future where love, art and peace may flourish.
That is a legacy that matters.
Peter Denton writes from his home in rural Manitoba.
Has Iran reached the end of the line?
SIX months ago, at the end of Iran’s presidential
election, I finished an article by speculating that
the long-lived theocratic dictatorship in Iran may
be a lot closer to its end than its beginning.
That observation was triggered by the fact that
the ‘reformist’ presidential candidate, Masoud
Pezeshkian, unexpectedly won the July elec-
tion. The previous president had been killed in a
helicopter crash and the regime had fumbled in
setting up a snap election to replace him.
Pezeshkian was the only token ‘moderate’ in a
field of four candidates, but he managed to make
it into the last two for the second round — and
then, in the runoff vote, something remarkable
happened.
Fewer than half the voters had bothered to show
up for the first round of voting, because they
assumed that the fix was in. Suddenly, however,
the moderate candidate had a chance of winning
— and seven million extra voters showed up for
the second round and carried the ‘reformist’ to
victory.
It was only a small victory, because Pezesh-
kian is very timid (otherwise he wouldn’t have
been allowed even to run), but more importantly
because Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khame-
nei has been the real and absolute ruler of Iran
ever since Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini died in
1989. It just showed that the public would prefer
somebody else.
That doesn’t count for much in a theocracy.
It just allowed for a bit of speculation about the
long-term future of the country. But much has
happened in the Middle East since last July, none
of it good news for the Iranian regime.
First, the vaunted “axis of resistance” that Iran
had created to keep Israel on the defensive and
boost its own power has been largely dismantled
in the past six months.
Hamas in the Gaza Strip has been mostly de-
stroyed, the Hezbollah organization that dominat-
ed Lebanon is disabled and the recent overthrow
of the Assad regime in Syria has eliminated Iran’s
strongest supporter in the region.
That was a homegrown revolt by Sunni Isla-
mists backed by Turkey and it’s part of a broader
decline of Shia power in the region’s politics. Shia
Iran no longer has any allies in the Arab countries
that border on Israel and there is little chance
that it can win them back.
Worse yet for Tehran, the tit-for-tat missile
strikes between Iran and Israel over the past few
months showed that Iran’s missiles for the most
part cannot get through, while the Israeli Air
Force could and did destroy most of Iran’s air de-
fences. The country is virtually naked militarily.
Even more dangerous for the regime is the
accelerating decline of the economy. It was
undermined by decades of overspending abroad
to spread its radical religious message, but
equally by under-investment at home since Iran’s
attempts to sponsor revolutions elsewhere led to
stringent international sanctions against it.
The damage has been extreme. Iran’s per capita
gross domestic product in 1976, a couple of years
before the Islamist takeover, was US$7,600. Now
it is only US$5,700, despite all the oil and gas.
Per capita GDP in next-door Turkey, similar
in size, resources and population but with little
gas or oil, was only US$1,270 in 1976. It is now
US$13,000. Which one would you prefer?
Most Iranians don’t know those exact numbers,
but they do know roughly what happened and why
— and the result, now unfolding for all to see, is a
ruined economy.
Iran has the world’s second-largest natural gas
reserves and third-largest oil reserves, but the
rot has gone so deep that it cannot even keep the
lights and the heat on.
There were frequent brief power outages last
summer, but this winter the electricity is going
off for days at a time. Factories, steel plants and
the like are shutting down; schools and univer-
sities are teaching remotely. A lot of people are
unhappy or downright angry and they know who
to blame.
There have been three episodes of prolonged
mass protests against the regime (2009, 2019 and
2022), and despite the cold winter weather an-
other one could be on the way now. Or not; these
things are unpredictable.
But we can probably now say with some confi-
dence: “Someday soon this will come to an end.”
Gwynne Dyer’s new book is Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas
from the World’s Climate Engineers.
Food
security
in Winnipeg
schools
THE news on conflict, poverty and crime is
so bad and so overwhelming that sometimes
we forget that good things happen, too.
On Dec. 13 at Hugh John Macdonald
School on Bannatyne Avenue in Winnipeg,
one of those good things occurred; students,
parents, teachers, philanthropists and repre-
sentatives from the federal, provincial and
municipal governments met to celebrate the
installation of a renovated kitchen designed
to ensure that no student at the school would
ever again begin the day hungry.
My wife and I were privileged to attend
the event and were met at the door by
enthusiastic members of the student council
who escorted us to the kitchen. Hugh John
Macdonald School is benefiting by being
included in the Winnipeg School Division
nutrition program which, in turn, has been
able to expand with support from the prov-
ince, federal government and philanthropic
sector.
“This is huge for us. Huge,” said Jennifer
Scott, principal of Hugh John Macdonald,
about the nutrition program.
“This is going to allow us to really scale
and feed all the kids that are hungry.”
There is a vast amount of research on the
multiple benefits of school breakfast and
lunch programs: the Harvard T.H. Chan
School of Public Health, for example, reports
that school food programs improve cog-
nition, enabling students to be more alert,
pay better attention and do better in math
and reading scores. A 2012 study by the
Toronto School Board, Feeding our Future,
in a large sample of Grade 7 and 8 students
showed that 61 per cent of students who ate
breakfast achieved or exceeded provincial
reading standards, compared to 50 per cent
who did not.
Investing in school nutrition programs
is therefore as close to a universal good in
education policy as one is likely to find. And
the need is great: Food Matters Manitoba re-
ports that “Over 14 per cent of Manitobans,
60 per cent of Northern residents living on
reserve and over one in five children across
the province experience Household Food
Insecurity.” Harvest Manitoba, for example,
provides food security programs to over
100,000 Manitobans every month in 50 com-
munities across the province.
Teachers and principals have long known
about the debilitating impact of hunger in
their classrooms. Many I know used their
own money to buy granola bars and fruit for
their neediest students.
But help is now on the way; 79 schools
receive funding from the nutrition program,
for school kitchen construction or renova-
tion, hiring chefs or grants for food purchas-
es. Senior governments have come together,
often a rarity in our federation, to contribute
to this critical initiative. In January 2024,
the province announced it would invest $30
million to expand school nutrition, much of it
going directly to school divisions.
As Premier Wab Kinew stated, “kids can’t
learn on an empty stomach.” The federal
government announced, in June 2024, a
National School Food Policy to provide
meals for up to 400,000 children a year, and
in October, Manitoba signed an agreement
with the Government of Canada to expand
school food programs even more to include
thousands of additional Manitoba children.
This is co-operative federalism at its best.
Also present at Hugh John Macdonald
School were Maria and Walter Schroeder,
whose foundation has also partnered with
the Winnipeg School Division in providing
grants for food security and education op-
portunity programs in North End schools.
The Schroeders told a story about grow-
ing up in the area and how an individual act
of a caring educator changed their lives.
Maria Schroeder faced the prospect of being
forced to leave school until the principal
at Daniel McIntyre Collegiate paid a visit
to her home and persuaded her family that
she was one of the school’s most promising
students.
What made this story especially meaning-
ful to the Hugh John Macdonald students
was that the daughter of that principal, now
in her 80s, was at the opening of the kitchen
to recall her father’s impact.
There is meaning for all of us in that story.
Individual acts of kindness and engage-
ment can have an enormous ripple effect on
future generations. “The arc of the moral
universe is long,” said Martin Luther King
Jr. “but it bends toward justice.”
In Manitoba, that arc is finally bending to-
wards ensuring that no student goes hungry.
Thomas S. Axworthy is public policy chair of Massey College
and volunteers as an adviser to the Schroeder Foundation.
THOMAS S. AXWORTHY
PETER DENTON
GWYNNE DYER
SUBMITTED
The power of the press: more people will see this picture than will ever read all of columnist Peter Denton’s books, combined.
;