Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - January 21, 2025, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Stop the blame game
Re: Homeless plan stokes fears (Jan. 20)
Prior to the last provincial election, the NDP
pledged to repair the damage the PCs did to our
health care, among other things. Fifteen months
later we’re still reading about wait times and
individuals dying in emergency or being misdiag-
nosed and released. The article about the living
conditions in some Manitoba Housing residences
contains details which anyone would find appall-
ing.
When the provincial government is asked about
these situations, it seems whether it is Health
Minister Uzoma Asagwara, Housing Minister
Bernadette Smith or any other member, they play
the blame game on how the PCs caused these
problems.
After 15 months in office, I think it’s time to
quit the finger-pointing and take responsibility
for the things they haven’t fixed.
HARRY PETERSON
Winnipeg
Save disability benefit
Re: Disability benefit at risk unless quick action
taken to approve regulations: advocates (Jan. 18)
There are many Manitobans with disabili-
ties that have a significant physical or mental
health-related impairment; in addition, many
have a low income.
The Canada Disability Benefit’s regulations
still haven’t been approved.
This program was to provide up to $200 per
month to eligible aged Canadians with disabilities
to help those struggling to keep a roof over their
head and food on the table. The Canada Disability
Benefit program was to come into effect July 1.
Unfortunately, that will not be the case!
Throughout Canada, advocacy groups in con-
junction with disability organizations were spear-
heading this project to create a more inclusive
and fair process in assisting Canadians. Over the
years, I have been affiliated with people who had
a qualifying disability that impacted their activi-
ties on a daily basis. These Canadians that I have
been in contact with throughout those years, and
others, contribute to our society in many ways.
Disabled Canadians deserve dignity and equali-
ty. They simply cannot be left behind.
Please, let’s not let this be a dismal failure.
PETER JOHN MANASTYRSKY
Winnipeg
Misguided plans
Re: Committee votes to set aside cash for Arling-
ton Bridge (Jan. 17)
Despite the nearby Salter and McPhillips
streets rail crossings, Coun. Janice Lukes favours
taking on $30 million in debt to replace the Ar-
lington Bridge as a “trade corridor.” Meanwhile,
the city has no money to clean up burned-out
Main Street properties and acquiring vacant
homes for refurbishment as supportive housing.
Our mayor favours fining property owners when
arsonists strike.
Council has grand plans for new transit routes
but riders are unable to use bus shelters in winter
due to their city-tolerated use as homeless shel-
ters.
It’s sad that taxpayers have to hear these
well-intentioned but misguided plans rather than
creative, effective ideas to meet the inner city’s
growing safety and housing needs.
WAYNE MANISHEN
Winnipeg
Curl Canada must do better
Re: To hell and back (Jan. 16)
I have been an avid curling follower since I saw
Ernie Richardson and his team win his fourth
Brier in Brandon in 1963. I’ve always enjoyed the
venerable old roaring game. But I wonder what
has happened to the civility and respect usually
accorded to what was once the friendliest game
to play and watch.
I am totally baffled by what happened to Bri-
ane Harris over the last year. Testing positive for
a “trace” of Ligandrol picked up by a kiss from
her husband and consequently being immediately
banned from the Scotties followed by a year of
trying to exonerate herself and get back to play-
ing the game she loves is beyond comprehension.
“Trace” is the operative word. We all remem-
ber the East German swimmers and others
whose body shape indicated they were pumped
full of performance-enhancing drugs. How can a
trace amount enhance performance? Why not set
a level where once that level is crossed, it could
enhance performance? The actions of Curling
Canada, and the delay by the Court of Arbitration
for Sport to bring down their verdict in this case,
make me suspicious as to what actually caused
this situation in the first place.
Questions I have that I’ll never know the an-
swer to are these: did Briane or one of her team-
mates inadvertently say something or cross paths
with some vindictive person in Curling Canada
who determined the team needed to be punished?
Was the Einarson team just so successful over
the past few years that someone decided they
needed their lofty position taken down a notch, all
the while knowing how much of an effect it would
have on the team and the daily life of Ms. Harris?
I would have expected better from Curling
Canada and the Court of Arbitration for Sport. It
certainly could have been handled a lot more dip-
lomatically. For the sake and future of the sport
let’s not ever see this happen again.
LARRY GOMPF
Winnipeg
In praise of Martin
Every Saturday, after our Free Press is deliv-
ered and it is time to dissect the paper, I ask, “Is
there a Nick Martin?” We look forward to reading
his critique of famous, infamous and genuinely
unknown mystery authors. His observations, of
gruesome murders, dysfunctional detectives and
shady characters give just enough to make us
want to get that latest title. Nick has an uncanny
ability to steer us through a complicated plot and
knows when to put on the brakes before giving
too much away.
We are amazed at the number of books he reads
and how entertaining his reviews can be. Keep
up the great work and we will be waiting for the
next mystery to unfold (but not revealed, eh?).
MARY PRENTICE
Winnipeg
Wasted opportunity
Re: Sutherland Hotel destroyed by fire (Jan. 16)
It’s unfortunate the province or city did not buy
the Sutherland Hotel. There were about 60 rooms
in that hotel that could have been renovated for
the new proposal in getting people living in en-
campments into proper housing.
It would have been economically and socially
more efficient as the various health and social
agencies that will be involved in the transition for
the previously homeless could deal with multiple
people at the same location. But not all is lost
as the core still has hotels such as the Manwin
Hotel, the Mount Royal, and the King’s that are
all vacant.
As well, these hotels are close to the numerous
outreach programs like Siloam Mission, The
Lighthouse and Our Relatives’ Place which could
help in the transition from homelessness.
ALFRED SANSREGRET
Winnipeg
University wrong to scrap
language program
Re: U of W kicks women’s soccer team, English
Language Program to curb (Jan. 14)
The University of Winnipeg’s decision to cut
its English language program is shortsighted and
wrong. They rationalize the cut by saying the
program is outside of their core programming.
This tells me a few things.
It tells me they don’t recognize that their lan-
guage program is a major recruitment channel
for the university; that by primarily relying
on language proficiency tests for international
student admissions, they will limit the number of
countries from which to recruit and, consequent-
ly, reduce the diversity of the student population;
and they don’t understand that proficient English
with understanding of Canadian culture and
context is the most essential skill for their stu-
dents to be successful in their studies and to find
employment after graduation.
Cutting the language program will exacerbate
the decline of international students, limit the
diversity of their student population and produce
poorer results for students and the university.
GARY GERVAIS
Winnipeg
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
WHAT’S YOUR TAKE?
THE FREE PRESS WANTS TO HEAR FROM YOU.
The Free Press is committed to publishing a diverse
selection of letters from a broad cross-section of our
audience.
The Free Press will also consider longer submissions for inclu-
sion on our Think Tank page, which is a platform mandated
to present a wide range of perspectives on issues of current
interest.
We welcome our readers’ feedback on articles and letters on
these pages and in other sections of the Free Press
● Email:
Letters: letters@winnipegfreepress.com
Think Tank submissions: opinion@winnipegfreepress.com
● Post:
Letters to the Editor, 1355 Mountain Ave.,
Winnipeg, R2X 3B6
Please include your name, address
and daytime phone number.
OUR VIEW YOUR SAY
COMMENT EDITOR: RUSSELL WANGERSKY 204-697-7269 ● RUSSELL.WANGERSKY@WINNIPEGFREEPRESS.COM
A6 TUESDAY JANUARY 21, 2025
Sometimes, you can fight city hall
W
INNIPEG Mayor Scott Gillingham’s
change of heart on a proposed pilot pro-
ject that would have cut snow-clearing
services on residential roads is a useful reminder
that citizen engagement with government can be
a powerful tool.
The city unveiled the pilot project as part of
its 2025 budget released last month. Under the
proposed plan, the threshold to plow residential
streets would have been raised to 15 centimetres
of snowfall from the current 10 cm beginning in
October.
The estimated savings: between $2.75 million
and $5 million a year. But it would have come
with a human cost.
Critics, including those concerned with how it
would affect pedestrian mobility, immediately
panned the idea. They rightly pointed out that
many pedestrians already struggle with poorly
cleared sidewalks and some are forced to use
residential streets where there are no sidewalks.
Less-frequent clearing of residential roads would
only make matters worse, they argued.
People with disabilities, including those who
use mobility devices, would have been particular-
ly hard-hit.
David Kron, executive director of the Cerebral
Palsy Association of Manitoba, said the proposed
change would have forced some people to stay
home more often.
“It doesn’t take a lot of snow buildup to make
a street or a sidewalk inaccessible for folks that
use a manual or power chair or, like myself …
a cane,” he said. “If folks can’t get out of their
homes, they can’t be part of the community.”
He and many others voiced their concerns
about the pilot project. And, as elected officials
often do when there is a groundswell of oppo-
sition to a proposed plan, they reversed their
decision.
In a unanimous vote last week, council’s public
works committee passed a motion to scrap the
pilot project. Gillingham said he would support
the motion when city council votes on the overall
budget on Jan. 29.
“We had more feedback concerned (with) the
snow-clearing pilot idea than we did about the
(proposed 5.95 per cent) property tax increase,”
he said.
The people spoke and the politicians listened.
That is a hallmark of our democracy. People often
think they have no say over how governments
spend their tax dollars or what laws and bylaws
they enact. In fact they do, mainly because politi-
cians want to get re-elected and do pay attention
to citizen feedback.
That may not always be desirable when debat-
ing controversial policies, such as supervised
consumption sites or how to combat homeless-
ness, since it can fuel populist sentiment in
government that may contradict evidence-based
research.
Politicians still have to make tough decisions
from time to time that may not always be popular
with the public. The province, under then-pre-
mier Duff Roblin, would never have built the Red
River Floodway in the 1960s had it only listened
to the critics.
But when it comes to basic services like
snow-clearing, library services, public schools or
health care, politicians do typically pay attention
to public sentiment. If they don’t, they do so at
their own peril.
City council may, for example, want to pay
closer attention to the public backlash around the
decision to scrap the Community Connections
program at the Millennium Library. The city
touted the program in 2022 as a valuable pub-
lic service “that will connect individuals with
library services and social supports, including
items to help meet basic needs” when it was first
launched.
Citizen engagement on public policy issues
matters. The public has power and influence over
what their elected officials do. The about-face
at city hall on the proposed snow-clearing cut
underscores that reality.
EDITORIAL
Published since 1872 on Treaty 1 territory and the homeland of the Métis
MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS FILES
Winnipeg Mayor Scott Gillingham
;