Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - November 1, 2025, Winnipeg, Manitoba
THINK
TANK
COMMENT EDITOR: RUSSELL WANGERSKY 204-697-7269 ● RUSSELL.WANGERSKY@WINNIPEGFREEPRESS.COM
A9 SATURDAY NOVEMBER 1, 2025
Ideas, Issues, Insights
C
ANADA’S trade talks with the United States
need to come with a warning sign: “Not as
advertised.”
Elbows-up retaliatory tariffs? Not now. A
comprehensive new “economic and security re-
lationship” between the two countries? Not in the
cards. Canada about to become President Donald
Trump’s cherished 51st state? Not serious. A June
announcement of a deal within 30 days? Not a
chance. A return to pre-Trump tariff-free days?
Never. A future for Canada’s auto sector? Not if
the U.S. can help it.
Canadians are realizing that nothing about re-
solving the trade and tariff relationship with the
U.S. has been as advertised. What we were told
would happen, could happen, hasn’t happened.
The chaos and cacophony of the past week prove
it. All brought to you by Ontario Premier Doug
Ford’s provocative ad, featuring dead president
Ronald Reagan’s free trade resurrection, followed
by a very much alive President Donald Trump’s
temper tantrum terminating negotiations.
Ontario’s ad showed Reagan extolling the vir-
tues of free trade without tariffs. Trump called it
“FAKE” — saying Reagan “loved” tariffs. Piqued,
he stopped trade talks with us. The Ronald Rea-
gan Institute said it “misrepresented” Reagan’s
views, demanding an apology. Trump administra-
tion officials stepped up, variously blaming the
ad for disrespecting Reagan and Trump; Ford for
disrespecting the U.S.; or Canada’s negotiating
team for disrespecting American interests. “Can-
ada had it coming,” basically, is the White House
position.
This “blame Canada” game is being played out
on both sides of the border.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre blames
the PM for having “approved” Ontario’s ad and
failing to secure a deal with Trump; Carney was
“looking for someone to blame,” he said. The Busi-
ness Council of Canada head indirectly blamed
Ford and Carney together, saying “in a trade war
you need one general, not 13 of them.” U.S. Am-
bassador Pete Hoekstra blamed Ford, swearing in
public at Ontario’s trade representative for the ad.
So, what’s the truth? The episode has revealed
three uncomfortable truths for Canada.
The most important is that the Republican
consensus on free trade led by Reagan is gone.
Trump’s MAGA protectionist worldview of tariffs
is the official position of his party and country.
Ontario’s ad tried to tickle a nostalgia that no
longer exists in Trump’s party. Tariffs are here
to stay.
The second uncomfortable truth is that the U.S.
is wielding tariffs not to rectify or even out unfair
trade practices, but to assert economic hegemony
over its trading partner. Mutually beneficial pros-
perity is not the goal. American dominance is.
That truth was revealed by U.S. Commerce
Secretary Howard Lutnick at a recent conference
when he stated that Canada should “come second”
to the U.S. when it comes to the auto sector. They
would buy auto parts from Canada, “but that’s
about it.”
The third uncomfortable truth is that tradition-
al negotiating approaches Canada has relied upon
in the past will not work with Trump. Canada
offered concessions by scrapping the digital
services tax, lifting counter-tariffs and pledging
higher defence spending. Meant to set the table
for fruitful if tough negotiations, Trump simply
upended the table in a late-night rant. If the U.S.
thought it was close to a deal it liked, it wouldn’t
have done this. Elbows-up at the negotiating table
narrows the prospect of a deal Trump will accept,
rather than enhancing it.
This leads to an emerging uncomfortable truth:
there is no deal to be had on Trump’s terms that
Carney could accept. If Trump wants our auto
sector to stop making cars or demands permanent
high tariffs and duties on steel, lumber and alumi-
num, can any prime minister sign onto this? Yet,
no relief from current tariffs means our already
weakening economy will weaken further.
Can America remain an economic ally or will
it become an economic adversary? This question
will roil Canadian politics ahead. The groundwork
for this debate is already being laid. Liberals say
our past economic relationship with the U.S. is
“over,” we need to secure other world markets
and that, in Carney’s words, “no deal is better
than a bad deal.” Conservatives are arguing
the opposite case: the U.S. will remain our most
important trading partner, a deal can be had, that
a failure to negotiate successfully is the prime
minister’s fault.
As always, there are truths on both sides. Amer-
ica will remain Canada’s most important econom-
ic partner in value for years to come. But there is
no turning the clock back to “before Trump,” con-
vincing him to see Canada the benign way past
presidents did. He obsesses about hemispheric
competition with China and Russia, not economic
co-operation with Canada. That is the prism in
which he views where our country fits.
The inescapable fact is that while nothing has
yet changed since Mark Carney became prime
minister, everything has changed since Donald
Trump became president. It just took an ad to
remind us there are many truths in advertising.
David McLaughlin is a former clerk of the executive council and cabinet
secretary in the Manitoba government.
The hoops and hurdles of finding a family doctor
FAMILY doctors. Everybody needs them.
But I have never had great luck finding one.
Without a driver’s license and with no interest
in returning to public transit after too many bad
experiences, finding a female doctor that I can
access easily has been challenging.
My early adult years were spent without one.
Then, from my 30s to my 40s I had a family doc-
tor, and I was extremely grateful for her. When
she took early retirement because of her own
health issues, I was devastated.
After that, it was rare trips to walk-in clinics
and only when absolutely necessary. I did all I
could to avoid ever needing to go.
I can manage without a doctor, I figured.
But when I turned 50, I began to really under-
stand the importance of having one. I started to
be much more aware of my own vulnerability.
With certain medical tests required or at least
strongly suggested, the question always comes up,
“Who is your family doctor?”
For many years my answer was, “I don’t have
one.”
Last year, at age 61, I found one. Finally, within
walking distance from our home — this seemed
too good to be true. She was kind and considerate;
she listened and seemed to genuinely care about
my concerns. She understood veganism, natural
health and my practice of both. When other phy-
sicians had wanted to prescribe medications for
every little thing, it seemed, she never did. I felt
like I’d won the lottery, after all that time. I was
thrilled and relieved.
And then, after a year, she decided to leave the
province. I was devastated once again.
Back to the drawing board.
I asked friends and others for recommenda-
tions. A few people suggested I look into finding
a nurse practitioner instead — which appealed to
me immensely — but I have yet to be successful. I
looked into Doctor Finder and checked out numer-
ous new clinics popping up all over the place with
that welcome sign, “Accepting New Patients.”
Calls, emails, online messages. Some get back to
me, others don’t.
Since my doctor left earlier this year, I’ve
attended two meet-and-greets with new doctors.
The first one had no knowledge of living vegan or
holistic health (which are of primary importance
to me), and no interest in finding out how we
could work together to incorporate both natural
health practices and the more traditional western
medicine.
The second one gave me a lecture on the need
for medications and scoffed, “I know people like
you” less than two minutes after meeting me. Was
it my tattoos? My eyeliner? My being vegan? I
couldn’t tell, but as the saying goes, we definitely
weren’t vibing. I felt humiliated.
If feeling safe and comfortable are basic
requirements for us to have with our family
physician, there was no way this was ever going
to work for me. Needless to say, those meet-and-
greets were the first and last appointments with
those two doctors.
I made the mistake of reading online reviews
for the next doctor I’m scheduled to meet next
month. As a need-to-know person, I like to gather
up as much information as possible before I agree
to any kind of commitment or important relation-
ship. Many of the reviews are downright awful.
I’m not sure that I want to find out why that might
be.
And I’m not sure whether I’ll keep looking for
another doctor or just give up entirely. But as my
senior years are fast approaching, I’m more than
a little worried about what will happen.
I do wonder why it seems so hard to find a
physician who is caring and respectful of diverse
needs and lifestyles. I mean, I may be high-needs
in some ways, but I’m thankful and generally not
that hard to deal with. I do ask questions, though,
but I’d like to believe that is still considered
acceptable.
I’ve had incredibly positive experiences with
doctors and nurses at the HSC Women’s Hospital
while dealing with an ongoing health issue over
the last few years. When I emailed the staff to
thank them for their outstanding patience and
care, they were grateful for my feedback and
asked if they could share my message with oth-
ers.
But trying to find a family doctor who gets me
feels impossible. Am I asking too much?
So here I am, 62 years of age, in need of a
doctor who doesn’t jump to judgment and ridicule
about lifestyles or anything else.
I can only imagine how many other women are
in the same boat for different reasons, be they
value-based, cultural or religious. I don’t think it’s
too much to ask to be treated with compassion and
respect, no matter who you are and what kind of
life you lead.
Aging can leave many feeling exposed, unpro-
tected. At a time in our lives when we may need
more care, it would be really great if it wasn’t so
hard to find.
Janine LeGal is a Winnipeg writer.
The necessity
of the arts
IT’S easy to take arts and culture for
granted. Not because they don’t matter, but
because they’re woven so deeply into our
daily lives.
They’re in the stories we tell, the music in
our earbuds, the festivals that bring neigh-
bours into the streets and the murals that
brighten our downtowns.
Arts and culture are part of who we are as
Manitobans.
But the arts aren’t just “nice to have.”
They’re essential. Especially right now.
We’re living in uncertain times. Our
economy faces instability, and we need to
diversify our trade partnerships. Young
people are questioning their futures. Con-
versations between communities are harder
to have and the gaps between us seem to be
widening.
There’s hope too, of course, and arts and
culture show us what’s possible. It is the one
sector uniquely equipped to respond to all
these challenges.
Arts and culture give us joy, creativity and
a break from everyday pressures. But they
also fuel Manitoba in ways that are often
invisible until you look more closely.
The Manitoba Arts Council recently
released a new study that makes the value of
the arts clearer. Arts and culture generate
three per cent of our GDP, which is about the
same as commercial construction, contribut-
ing $1.75 billion to Manitoba’s economy.
More than 20,000 Manitobans work in the
sector. These artists, technicians, designers,
administrators and entrepreneurs make up
one of the most adaptable, skilled and inno-
vative workforces in the province.
And the economics ripple outward. Ticket
sales, classes, admissions, festivals and live
events generate money that is spent locally
on wages, supplies, venues, transportation
and food. That means more jobs, more tax
revenue and stronger communities.
Our arts and culture scene also attracts
tourists — tourists who spend.
According to a joint Manitoba Arts Coun-
cil/Travel Manitoba report, tourists who
take in arts and culture activities in Mani-
toba spend more than double compared to
those who do not.
And it’s not just visitors that are attracted,
it’s new Manitobans. The Manitoba Cham-
bers of Commerce found that a vibrant arts
and culture community is a major reason
young professionals choose to move here.
Turns out, we all want to live in a connected
and interesting place.
Even internationally, art connects us.
Cultural diplomacy helps build trust, rela-
tionships and trade opportunities long before
formal agreements are signed.
But the value of the arts can’t only be mea-
sured in dollars. Importantly, art helps us
understand each other and even ourselves.
Artists show us a different way to look
at the world and spark conversations that
might never happen otherwise.
Community theatre brings rural towns
together. Powwows strengthen culture and
identity. A gallery exhibit can challenge us
to see from another perspective. A shared
song can cross languages and histories.
When we sing in a choir, pick up a drum,
join a writing class, dance, carve, paint or sit
in an audience and let someone else’s story
wash over us, we change.
Art opens space for reflection and healing.
It allows us to feel deeply in a way that’s
safe, human — and necessary. There’s a rea-
son so many healing and wellness programs
are rooted in culture and creativity.
Since I started working in the field de-
cades ago, people in the arts have wondered
how to best convey the value of the arts. Is
art meaningful simply because it exists?
Should we talk about lives changed through
culture and community? Is economic impact
important?
The truth is, it’s all of this.
Here in Manitoba, we’re incredibly
lucky. There are multiple arts and cultural
offerings every day of the year, from large
festivals to small community workshops
— almost every Manitoban participates in
some way.
More than 90 per cent of Manitobans say
the arts celebrate our province’s unique cul-
tural identity. They say the arts make Man-
itoba distinct and help us find our collective
voice. That’s something we’ve built together
and we should be proud of it.
So, to Manitoba’s arts community, thank
you. Thank you for the creativity, the
courage, the joy, the ideas, the jobs and the
opportunities.
And thank you to everyone across the
province who learns, watches, donates, vol-
unteers, teaches and creates.
The arts are essential right now — and
always — because of you.
Katarina Kupca is the chair of the Manitoba Arts Council — the
provincial crown agency that supports artists, arts and cultural
organizations, Indigenous Knowledge Keepers, students of
the arts and arts/cultural professionals throughout Manitoba.
www.artscouncil.mb.ca.
KATARINA KUPCA
JANINE LEGAL
DAVID MCLAUGHLIN
ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES
A lot has changed since U.S. President Donald Trump welcomed Prime Minister Mark Carney to the White House just three weeks ago.
The bitter truth found by advertising
;