Winnipeg Free Press (Newspaper) - November 21, 2025, Winnipeg, Manitoba
Ridiculous rationale
Re: Charter rights override on trans laws to
prevent ‘medical experiments’ on children: Smith
(Nov. 20)
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith talking about
“science” and “data” is an absolute joke.
Smith’s government has spent the last sever-
al years brushing aside all evidence and data
regarding public health, vaccine safety, mental
health care, addictions treatment and prevention,
climate change, Indigenous history and rights …
the list goes on and on. The very fact that Smith
thinks science is something that can be blindly
believed in, like a religion, rather than properly
understood as a framework for creating and
furthering knowledge about how the world works,
is proof (as though more were needed!) that she
has no business butting into the expert fields of
pediatrics, endocrinology, psychiatry and family
medicine.
As a physician, I am appalled and insulted at
the vile accusation that compassionate physicians
providing evidence-based and patient-oriented
care are conducting “medical experiments” on
children, with all the Josef Mengele connotations
in that phrase. Stay in your lane, UCP. Stick to
funding and leave the health care of transgender
children, youth and adults to the individuals,
families and professionals who know what they
are doing — those who actually care about the
well-being of their families and patients.
I wonder how the UCP government would have
reacted if their new favourite human rights-de-
nying notwithstanding clause had been imposed
by the federal Liberal government in 2020 to
mandate public health measures? No wonderment
needed — they would have shrieked! In fact, the
federal government did not impose that draco-
nian piece of legislation precisely because the
public health measures taken were — and were
subsequently adjudicated to be — lawful, reason-
able and necessary.
By contrast, stomping on transgender health
care is unreasonable, unnecessary and an affront
to human rights. Only cowards hide behind the
notwithstanding clause.
SOWMYA DAKSHINAMURTI
Winnipeg
Abnormal circumstances
Re: ‘Quiet, piggy’, Trump tells female reporter
(Nov. 19)
Under normal circumstances an article like
this would shock me and probably most of your
readers. But these are not normal times with U.S.
President Donald Trump in the White House.
These rude comments to reporter Catherine
Lucey are unacceptable, but mild compared to
past and ongoing behaviour of this president. The
American people elected this rude man despite
the many felony charges against him, and, not to
mention, his many undesirable characteristics as
a narcissistic, xenophobic, racist, homophobic and
bigoted man who has a history of sexual miscon-
duct and misogynistic behaviour.
Not to mention his cabinet of unqualified syco-
phants who support his rude behaviour. This is
the new norm in the Trump administration. It’s
only a matter of time before they will all self-de-
struct, making the world a better, safer place.
TERRY MEINDL
Winnipeg
The howling class
Re: Two reports, two views on crime, zero solu-
tions (Nov. 17)
In spite of the somewhat misleading headline
(the second report cited in fact does offer solu-
tions), columnist Dan Lett lands some well-de-
served punches on the dishonest discussion
around crime and bail reform.
Beyond that, he also introduces a new and
potentially useful category of analysis, namely
that of the “howling class.” The North American
political economy has been notoriously averse
to a class analysis, preferring more ambiguous
terms such as “middle class,” “lower class/ upper
class” or the “one per cent.” That said, “working
class” does seem to be having its moment.
As a category, “howling class” is more descrip-
tive than analytical and doesn’t capture the social
dynamic of the classic pairing: working class/
proletariat versus capitalist class/bourgeoisie.
It does, however, provide us with an interesting
(and dare I say, entertaining) lens through which
we can observe and consider the fearmongering
largely perpetrated by provincial and federal
Conservative politicians.
Howling class, indeed.
SIG LASER
Winnipeg
Costly solution
Re: Fifteen highlights from the throne speech
(Nov. 19)
While it’s nice that the people of Carberry are
getting a new $100-million overpass, is it really
necessary? Wasn’t the collision caused by human
error when the bus driver didn’t do that thing our
parents taught us — looking both ways before
crossing the street?
So, a new overpass will fix driver error poten-
tial (at that spot only), but at a pretty high cost.
Couldn’t that money be better spent on prenatal
care, doctor recruitment or — God forbid — low-
ering the deficit ?
DEREK ROLSTONE
Winnipeg
Literacy of utmost importance
Re: Health first, reading second (Think Tank,
Nov. 17)
It is disheartening that Jordan Laidlaw seems
quick to dismiss science-based evidence about
literacy scores. Part of the Manitoba Human
Rights Commission’s findings are directly related
to students with dyslexia, dyscalculia and similar
conditions that are going undiagnosed or un-
recognized. Teachers should be provided with
literacy tools that help identify these conditions
early, so support can be provided, as too many
children are reaching middle years and high
school undiagnosed.
I agree that mental health supports need to be
created by the province to improve access for
families. However, this can occur outside of the
school system. Laidlaw quotes that one in seven
students deal with mental health issues. A tragic
number, but those students will benefit the most
from strong literacy skills, as well as the other
six of seven in knowing how to access health
care, improve economic opportunities and more,
later in life.
Literacy is not only the foundation of education,
but the foundation of a healthy society.
KEVIN TOMANEK
Winnipeg
Pleasure to visit the city
Thank you, Winnipeg. I have just returned
home, here in Indiana, after my third trip to your
fair city this year.
My first trip was back in May when my wife
Arlene (McPherson, formerly of St. James) and I
came north to help our daughter, Peggy Glassco,
with her annual fundraiser for the Winnipeg
Children’s Hospital, sponsored by her business
GymKyds Gymnastics Centre. My second trip
was in July when my wife and I, along with my
brother and two sisters, came to enjoy a surprise
birthday party for Peggy put on by her staff at
her gym. It was a special birthday, but I won’t say
for what year. Whenever I am here in the sum-
mer, I always attend a Goldeyes baseball game.
I have been in several baseball stadiums, both
major and minor leagues, and your stadium is
the only one that I have been to that has a section
especially for customers who have an allergy
with peanuts. That is a great consideration for
baseball fans. My third trip was this past week
with my brother so we could be in Winnipeg for
the Grey Cup festivities, but the main reason was
to watch our daughter Peggy, who was a Blue
Bomber cheerleader back in the 1980s, and her
other cheerleader alumni, perform their routines
in the convention centre.
Your convention centre is second to none. What
a great building and event centre it is. The people
who worked at the convention centre along with
the volunteers were so helpful to my brother and
I that I can’t say thank you enough.
I have been coming to Winnipeg every year
since 1961. You have every reason to be proud of
your city, which is a shining star in the middle of
North America.
JOHN TRIBBLE
Brazil, Ind.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
WHAT’S YOUR TAKE?
THE FREE PRESS WANTS TO HEAR FROM YOU.
The Free Press is committed to publishing a diverse
selection of letters from a broad cross-section of our
audience.
The Free Press will also consider longer submissions for inclu-
sion on our Think Tank page, which is a platform mandated
to present a wide range of perspectives on issues of current
interest.
We welcome our readers’ feedback on articles and letters on
these pages and in other sections of the Free Press.
● Email:
Letters: letters@winnipegfreepress.com
Think Tank submissions: opinion@winnipegfreepress.com
● Post:
Letters to the Editor, 1355 Mountain Ave.,
Winnipeg, R2X 3B6
Please include your name, address
and daytime phone number.
OUR VIEW YOUR SAY
COMMENT EDITOR: RUSSELL WANGERSKY 204-697-7269 ● RUSSELL.WANGERSKY@WINNIPEGFREEPRESS.COM
A6 FRIDAY NOVEMBER 21, 2025
The throne speech: an oft-predictable event
I
T’S hard — really hard — to speak harshly
about the perennial chicken-in-absolute-
ly-every-pot that is the long legislative trad-
ition of the throne speech. It’s like dissing free
candy.
But, here goes.
Throne speeches have always been pomp and
circumstance more than anything else — an
opportunity for promises and governmental
self-praise. But as the years have gone by, throne
speeches right across the country have devolved
more into pump and circumstance, becoming al-
most exclusively an opportunity for governments
to shamelessly blow their own horns.
The best part, of course, has to be that they get
to use the King’s representative as their delivery
system, quite literally putting words in the mouth
of the vice-regal representative.
We say this with years of experience, covering
years of throne speeches. Editorial writers are
often long in the tooth media veterans who have
covered different administrations of varying
political stripes. (The author of this particular
editorial has experienced at least 75 throne
speeches, including federal offerings and provin-
cial throne speeches in Ontario, Newfoundland
and Labrador, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, and
can legitimately claim to be an expert, but jaded,
witness on the topic.)
They truly are a form of performative legis-
lative art — and get more so, it seems, every year.
The stage-managing is regular. Like provincial
budgets, tasty tidbits of the throne speech are
often selectively leaked to different media orga-
nizations to garner the most possible coverage of
government initiatives. This, despite the fact the
speeches themselves don’t even have the commit-
ment of a budget, where there are hard spend-
ing numbers in the accompanying Estimates
document.
In some ways, they at least recycle.
“My ministers are determined that the level of
services provided to Manitobans shall be main-
tained and improved, but the uncertainties that
exist surrounding federal intentions are a cause
for serious concern among all members of the
legislature. I am told that you will be informed of
the progress of federal-provincial negotiations on
this important subject,” one vice-regal represen-
tative read.
Guess the year.
If you picked 1980, you’d be correct. But to be
fair, it could be one of many years.
“We are committed to a renewed partnership
with the Government of Canada, as we pursue
our mutual economic objectives. We will only
succeed as a nation if we work together.” — 2021
“As new storm clouds gather in some of the
world’s leading economies, our government will
work closely with Manitobans to monitor the
implications for the provincial economy, and with
the federal government to formulate appropriate
policy responses.” — 2011
If you think you’ve heard it before, chances
are, you have.
Arguably, the throne speech serves a role in
saying what the government intends to do in the
coming year. But, as is often the case in throne
speeches, this year’s version included 48 things
the government has already done — blurring the
lines between self-promotion and any pretence of
laying out a plan for the near-term future.
To add insult to injury, a motion will be read
to thank the vice-regal reader and accept the
speech, which will succeed, while the opposition
traditionally moves an amendment, which will
fail.
And all of this will take eight days of legislative
debate, beyond the speech itself.
The debate often features lengthy orations
about individual political districts: here’s a sam-
ple of one piece of debate.
“Langruth is a great little community and
hosts a harvest festival, which includes children’s
activities. The graffiti station was a hit this year
where kids could go paint an old relic car. And
another unique game to play was the cow patty
bingo, something for everyone there.”
The process is a ritualized political theatre,
with its own rules and styles, but not much in the
way of actual deliverables.
And much legislative time wasted.
EDITORIAL
Published since 1872 on Treaty 1 territory and the homeland of the Métis
MIKE DEAL / FREE PRESS
Lt.-Gov. Anita Neville prepares to deliver the speech from
the throne.
;